Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27991611›Full record

ArticleOncology nursing forum2017

Dyadic Perceptions of the Decision Process in Families Living With Lung Cancer.

Lyndsey M Miller, Donald R Sullivan, Karen S Lyons

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03649737 (Pilot Study of a Progressive Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Patient-Partner Dyads), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03649737 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of a Progressive Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Patient-Partner Dyads

TypeinterventionalSponsorOHSU Knight Cancer InstituteRan2018 to 2019Enrolled46ConditionsLung Cancer, Depression, Physical Activity, Quality of LifeArmsExercise Intervention, Survey Administration, Quality-of-Life Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lyndsey M MillerUniversity of Utah.
Donald R SullivanOregon Health and Science University.
Karen S LyonsOregon Health and Science University.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute KL2 SupplementKL2TR002370 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine Lee Hough · 2017 to 2026
$10.1M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cancer, Caregiving and End-of-Life CareT32NR013456 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ELLINGTON, LEE A, MOONEY, KATHLEEN H · 2013 to 2022
$3.4M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteKL2TR000152 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
Preparing for future dementia care: A study of hospitalized patient-family dyadsF31NR015195 · NINR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, LYNDSEY MEDORA · 2014 to 2015
$86k
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000152NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002370NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015195NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE/

objectivesTo use dyadic analyses to identify determinants of patients' and family members' perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of the decision-making process in families living with lung cancer. 
.

designCross-sectional study. 
.

settingCommunity setting in Greater Portland, Oregon.
. SAMPLE: 109 family care dyads (patient and family member) recruited from a statewide cancer registry. 
.

methodsSurveys were completed in-person, separately, and privately by each member of the family care dyad. Secondary analysis was completed using multilevel modeling. 
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Negative and positive aspects of the decision process. 
.

findingsLevel 1 data revealed significant variability across care dyads' positive or negative perceptions of the decision-making process. Level 2 results for negative perceptions of decision making indicated that patient and family member perceptions were significantly associated with their own depressive symptoms and feelings of not being listened to by others. Level 2 results for positive perceptions of decision making indicated that patient and family member perceptions were significantly inversely associated with their own feelings of not being listened to and being in nonspousal relationships. In addition, family members' perceptions were more positive when the patients were older. 
.

conclusionsThis study highlighted the complexity of the decision-making process in families with lung cancer, and underscored the importance of the care dyad feeling listened to by family members in the context of life-threatening illnesses. 
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses assisting families with decisions about lung cancer should be aware of the dynamics of the care dyad and how the decision process is perceived by patients and their family members.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalDecision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude to DeathAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesFamilyFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOregonPatientscommunicationdecision makingfamilieslung cancermultilevel modeling

Identifiers

PMID27991611
PMCPMC5377929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.