ArticleOncology nursing forum2017
Dyadic Perceptions of the Decision Process in Families Living With Lung Cancer.
Article in Oncology nursing forum, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03649737 (Pilot Study of a Progressive Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Patient-Partner Dyads), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pilot Study of a Progressive Exercise Program Among Lung Cancer Patient-Partner Dyads
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparison of adult-child and spousal cancer caregivers' participation in medical decisions.PloS one · 2024Article
- Assessing the Impact of Family Caregivers in Clinical Encounter Participation on Patient Activation in the Metastatic Breast Cancer Setting.Research square · 2023Article
- Relationships between Anxiety, Depression, and Illness Perceptions in Lung and Breast Cancer Patients throughout the Cancer Continuum.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Involvement of adult children in treatment decision-making for older patients with cancer - a qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of oncology surgeons and nurses.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Patient activation and treatment decision-making in the context of cancer: examining the contribution of informal caregivers' involvement.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PURPOSE/
objectivesTo use dyadic analyses to identify determinants of patients' and family members' perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of the decision-making process in families living with lung cancer. .
designCross-sectional study. .
settingCommunity setting in Greater Portland, Oregon. . SAMPLE: 109 family care dyads (patient and family member) recruited from a statewide cancer registry. .
methodsSurveys were completed in-person, separately, and privately by each member of the family care dyad. Secondary analysis was completed using multilevel modeling. . MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Negative and positive aspects of the decision process. .
findingsLevel 1 data revealed significant variability across care dyads' positive or negative perceptions of the decision-making process. Level 2 results for negative perceptions of decision making indicated that patient and family member perceptions were significantly associated with their own depressive symptoms and feelings of not being listened to by others. Level 2 results for positive perceptions of decision making indicated that patient and family member perceptions were significantly inversely associated with their own feelings of not being listened to and being in nonspousal relationships. In addition, family members' perceptions were more positive when the patients were older. .
conclusionsThis study highlighted the complexity of the decision-making process in families with lung cancer, and underscored the importance of the care dyad feeling listened to by family members in the context of life-threatening illnesses. . IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Nurses assisting families with decisions about lung cancer should be aware of the dynamics of the care dyad and how the decision process is perceived by patients and their family members.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.