ReviewClinical genitourinary cancer2017
Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder: 20-Year Single-Institution Retrospective Review.
Review in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- Clinicopathological characteristics of transcription factor-defined subtypes in bladder small cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparative Genomic Characterization of Small Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder Compared With Urothelial Carcinoma and Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- A case-based review of urachal carcinoma with mixed small cell neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma components, with one new case report and analysis of nine published cases.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary treatment for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a case report.International cancer conference journal · 2024Article
- Small cell bladder carcinoma treated with nivolumab as adjuvant maintenance therapy.BMJ case reports · 2023Article
- Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinomas: Current Management and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Long-term Outcomes of Local and Metastatic Small Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder and Genomic Analysis of Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2022Article
- Prognostic Factors of Survival for High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasia of the Bladder: A SEER Database Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Article
- Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: A population-based analysis of long-term outcomes after radical cystectomy and bladder conservation with chemoradiotherapy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Small Cell Bladder Cancer Response to Second-line and Beyond Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: Retrospective Experience.Clinical genitourinary cancer · 2021Article
- Small cell carcinoma of the bladder: Review of pathogenesis, presentation, and management.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSmall-cell carcinoma of the bladder is a poorly differentiated neoplasm with aggressive behavior. We analyzed clinical outcomes of patients who were treated at our institution to identify an optimal treatment strategy. MATERIALS AND
methodsRetrospective chart analysis was performed for patients who were treated for small-cell carcinoma of the bladder at Fox Chase Cancer Center between 1995 and 2015. Survival was compared between different treatment periods (before January 2010 vs. after January 2010) and different treatment modalities (surgery vs. neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. radiation).
resultsThirty-eight patients were treated for small-cell carcinoma of the bladder at our institution during the 20-year study period. Median survival was 11.8 months and overall survival rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 46.6%, 26.2%, and 14%, respectively. Survival analysis adjusted for age, histology, and stage showed that no single treatment strategy was significantly superior (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-3.03; P = .860 for surgery; 95% CI, 0.31-2.87; P = .928 for neoadjuvant chemotherapy; 95% CI, 0.65-5.49; P = .238 for radiation). In separate analyses of long-term survivors, we found that most received platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. Among the 20 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, downstaging occurred in 9 (45%).
conclusionAlthough none of the treatment options were found to be significantly superior with respect to survival, neoadjuvant chemotherapy might halt the progression of the disease until cystectomy and lead to downstaging. At our institution, the best outcomes were observed in patients who received neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy combined with radical cystectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.