Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990763›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of rheumatic diseases2018

Circulating fibroblast activation protein and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis.

Premarani Sinnathurai, Wendy Lau, Ana Julia Vieira de Ribeiro, William W Bachovchin, Helen Englert, Graydon Howe, David Spencer, Nicholas Manolios, Mark D Gorrell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of rheumatic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Emerging Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 in Autoimmune Disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2022 · on this map
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Premarani SinnathuraiRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Wendy LauRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Ana Julia Vieira de RibeiroSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
William W BachovchinSackler School of Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Helen EnglertRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Graydon HoweRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
David SpencerRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas ManoliosRheumatology Department, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark D GorrellSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-2604
The University of Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AUTufts University · US

Funding

Using FAP to Selectively Target Epithelial CancersR01CA163930 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI BACHOVCHIN, WILLIAM W · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 1105238Australian National Health and Medical Research Council 632822NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163930NIH HHS R01 CA163930-01A1Perpetual Trustees and the Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo quantify circulating fibroblast activation protein (cFAP) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (cDPP4) protease activities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc), and a control group with mechanical back pain and to correlate plasma levels with disease characteristics.

methodsPlasma was collected from patients with RA (n = 73), SSc (n = 37) and control subjects (n = 26). DPP4 and FAP were quantified using specific enzyme activity assays.

resultsMedian cDPP4 was significantly lower in the RA group (P = 0.02), and SSc group (P = 0.002) compared with controls. There were no significant differences in median cFAP between the three groups. DPP4 and FAP demonstrated a negative correlation with inflammatory markers and duration of disease. There were no associations with disease subtypes in RA, including seropositive and erosive disease. Decreased cDPP4 was found in SSc patients with myositis. Plasma FAP was lower in RA patients receiving prednisone (P = 0.001) or leflunomide (P = 0.04), but higher with biologic agents (P = 0.01). RA patients receiving leflunomide also had decreased cDPP4 (P = 0.014). SSc patients receiving prednisone (P = 0.02) had lower cDPP4 but there was no association with cFAP.

conclusionsNo association was found between cFAP and RA or SSc. Plasma DPP4 was decreased in RA and SSc when compared with controls. cDPP4 and cFAP correlated negatively with inflammatory markers and there were no significant correlations with disease characteristics in this RA cohort.

Indexed as

AgedArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesDipeptidyl Peptidase 4EndopeptidasesFemaleFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGelatinasesGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammation MediatorsMaleMembrane ProteinsBiological ProductsBiomarkersDipeptidyl Peptidase 4DPP4 protein, humanEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGelatinasesGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsInflammation MediatorsMembrane ProteinsSerine Endopeptidasesbiomarkersenzymesfibroblastsinflammationlymphocytesproteases

Identifiers

PMID27990763
PMCPMC5476518
OpenAlexW2562144524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.