Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990560›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical oncology2017

Diagnostic value of tumor markers for lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion: a validation study and meta-analysis.

Mei Feng, Jing Zhu, Liqun Liang, Ni Zeng, Yanqiu Wu, Chun Wan, Yongchun Shen, Fuqiang Wen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. DNA Methylation Analysis of theJournal of oncology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 - tumor marker: Past, present, and future.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mei FengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jing ZhuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Liqun LiangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Ni ZengDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yanqiu WuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chun WanDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yongchun ShenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. shen_yongchun@126.com.
Fuqiang WenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPleural effusion is one of the most common complications of lung adenocarcinoma and is diagnostically challenging. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin fragment (CYFRA) 21-1, and cancer antigen (CA) 19-9 for lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion (MPE) through a validation study and meta-analysis.

methodsPleural effusion samples were collected from 81 lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPEs and 96 benign pleural effusions. CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. The capacity of tumor markers was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Standard methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic studies were used to summarize the diagnostic performance of CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 for lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE.

resultsThe pleural levels of CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 were significantly increased in lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE compared to benign pleural effusion. The cut-off points for CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 were optimally set at 4.55 ng/ml, 43.10 μg/ml, and 12.89 U/ml, and corresponding AUCs were 0.93, 0.85, and 0.81, respectively. The combination of CEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 increased the sensitivity to 95.06%, with an AUC of 0.95. Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. CEA showed the best diagnostic performance with pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of 0.75, 0.96, 16.01, 0.23, and 81.49, respectively. The AUC was 0.93.

conclusionsCEA, CYFRA 21-1, and CA19-9 play a role in the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma-associated MPE. The combination of these tumor markers increases the diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleHumansKeratin-19Lung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPleural Effusion, MalignantROC Curveantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenKeratin-19DiagnosisLung adenocarcinomaMalignant pleural effusionMeta-analysisTumor marker

Identifiers

PMID27990560
OpenAlexW2564952967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.