Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990351›Full record

ArticleNeuroepigenetics2016

Epigenetic profiling reveals a developmental decrease in promoter accessibility during cortical maturation

Ishwariya Venkatesh, Matthew T Simpson, Denise M Coley, Murray G Blackmore

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroepigenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Epigenetic Regulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advances and Limitations of Current Epigenetic Studies Investigating Mammalian Axonal Regeneration.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2018
    Review
  19. Intrinsic mechanisms of neuronal axon regeneration.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ishwariya VenkateshDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, 53201.
Matthew T SimpsonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, 53201.
Denise M ColeyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, 53201.
Murray G BlackmoreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Marquette University, 53201.
Marquette University · US

Funding

The transcription factor HHEX as a novel regulator of CNS axon regenerationR21NS095276 · NINDS · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI BLACKMORE, MURRAY G · 2015 to 2016
$429k
Novel Gene Targets at the Intersection of Axon Regeneration and Cancer BiologyR21NS093278 · NINDS · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI BLACKMORE, MURRAY G · 2016 to 2017
$415k
NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093278NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS095276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Axon regeneration in adult central nervous system (CNS) is limited in part by a developmental decline in the ability of injured neurons to re-express needed regeneration associated genes (RAGs). Adult CNS neurons may lack appropriate pro-regenerative transcription factors, or may display chromatin structure that restricts transcriptional access to RAGs. Here we performed epigenetic profiling around the promoter regions of key RAGs, and found progressive restriction across a time course of cortical maturation. These data identify a potential intrinsic constraint to axon growth in adult CNS neurons. Neurite outgrowth from cultured postnatal cortical neurons, however, proved insensitive to treatments that improve axon growth in other cell types, including combinatorial overexpression of AP1 factors, overexpression of histone acetyltransferases, and pharmacological inhibitors of histone deacetylases. This insensitivity could be due to intermediate chromatin closure at the time of culture, and highlights important differences in cell culture models used to test potential pro-regenerative interventions.

Identifiers

PMID27990351
PMCPMC5159751
OpenAlexW2552969456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.