Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990336›Full record

ArticleIMA fungus2016

Overlooked competing asexual and sexually typified generic names of

Amy Y Rossman, W Cavan Allen, Uwe Braun, Lisa A Castlebury, Priscila Chaverri, Pedro W Crous, David L Hawksworth, Kevin D Hyde, Peter Johnston, Lorenzo Lombard and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IMA fungus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Microorganisms · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypic Characterization and Phylogeny ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. PleomorphicMycoKeys · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. In silico analyses of maleidride biosynthetic gene clusters.Fungal biology and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  16. It's Complicated: Rapid Publication of Genomes inMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Studies in mycology · 2021
    Article
  20. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Amy Y RossmanDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
W Cavan AllenSystematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Uwe BraunMartin Luther University, Institute of Biology, Department of Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Herbarium, Neuwerk 21, 06099 Halle (Saale), Germany.
Lisa A CastleburySystematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Priscila ChaverriDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro San José, Costa Rica.
Pedro W CrousCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa; Microbiology, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David L HawksworthDepartamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, Plaza de Ramón y Cajal s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain; Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; Comparative Plant and Fungal Biology, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK.
Kevin D HydeCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.
Peter JohnstonLandcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Lorenzo LombardCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Megan RombergUSDA-APHIS National Identification Services, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Rob A SamsonCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Keith A SeifertOttawa Research and Development Centre, Biodiversity (Mycology and Microbiology), Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6, Canada.
Jeffrey K StoneDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Dhanushka UdayangaSystematic Mycology and Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
James F WhiteDepartment of Plant Biology & Pathology, Rutgers University, 59 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the change to one scientific name for fungal species, numerous papers have been published with recommendations for use or protection of competing generic names in major groups of ascomycetes. Although genera in each group of fungi were carefully considered, some competing generic names were overlooked. This paper makes recommendations for additional competing genera not considered in previous papers. Chairs of relevant Working Groups of the ICTF were consulted in the development of these recommendations. A number of generic names need protection, specifically

Indexed as

DiaporthalesDothideomycetesdual nomenclatureEurotialesHypocrealesLeotiomycetesnomenclaturepleomorphic fungiprotected lists of namestaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID27990336
PMCPMC5159600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.