Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990273›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2016

Advances in the management of osteosarcoma.

Stefan S Bielack, Stefanie Hecker-Nolting, Claudia Blattmann, Leo Kager

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Musculoskeletal and Marrow Sparing With Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy in Juvenile Mice.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Trends of publications on primary sarcomas of bone: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stefan S BielackKlinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin; Pädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Kriegsbergstrasse 62, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Germany.
Stefanie Hecker-NoltingKlinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin; Pädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Kriegsbergstrasse 62, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Germany.
Claudia BlattmannKlinikum Stuttgart - Olgahospital, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin; Pädiatrie 5 (Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Kriegsbergstrasse 62, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Germany.
Leo KagerSt. Anna Children's Hospital, Department of Paediatrics, Medical University Vienna and Children's Cancer Research Institute CCRI, Vienna, Austria.
Olgahospital · DESt Anna Children's Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma, a bone cancer most commonly seen in adolescents and young adults, is usually a high-grade malignancy characterized by a very high risk for the development of pulmonary metastases. High-grade osteosarcomas are usually treated by preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy and surgery, with a very limited number of active agents available. Rarer lower-grade variants such as parosteal and periosteal osteosarcoma or low-grade central osteosarcoma are treated by surgery only. Imaging to search for possible metastases focuses on the lung. Computed tomography is the most sensitive method but cannot reliably distinguish small metastases from benign lesions. Advances of local imaging and surgical reconstruction now allow the use of limb-salvage in an ever-increasing proportion of patients. While still troubled by complications, non-invasive endoprosthesis-lengthening mechanisms have led to an increased uptake of limb-salvage, even for young, skeletally immature patients. Radiotherapy is employed when osteosarcomas cannot be removed with clear margins, but very high doses are required, and both proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy are under investigation. Unfortunately, the past 30 years have witnessed few, if any, survival improvements. Novel agents have not led to universally accepted changes of treatment standards. In patients with operable high-grade osteosarcomas, the extent of histological response to preoperative chemotherapy is a significant predictive factor for both local and systemic control. Attempts to improve prognosis by adapting postoperative treatment to response, recently tested in a randomized, prospective setting by the European and American Osteosarcoma Study Group, have not been proven to be beneficial. Many agree that only increased knowledge about osteosarcoma biology will lead to novel, effective treatment approaches and will be able to move the field forward.

Indexed as

chemotherapyimagingosteosarcomaradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID27990273
PMCPMC5130082
OpenAlexW2556502410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.