Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990234›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of translational myology2016

Can FES-Augmented Active Cycling Training Improve Locomotion in Post-Acute Elderly Stroke Patients?

Elisabetta Peri, Emilia Ambrosini, Alessandra Pedrocchi, Giancarlo Ferrigno, Claudia Nava, Valentina Longoni, Marco Monticone, Simona Ferrante

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of translational myology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. FES in Europe and Beyond: Current Translational Research.European journal of translational myology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabetta PeriNearlab, Department of Electronics Informatics and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milano, Italy.
Emilia AmbrosiniNearlab, Department of Electronics Informatics and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS, Lissone, Italy.
Alessandra PedrocchiNearlab, Department of Electronics Informatics and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milano, Italy.
Giancarlo FerrignoNearlab, Department of Electronics Informatics and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milano, Italy.
Claudia NavaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS , Lissone, Italy.
Valentina LongoniPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS , Lissone, Italy.
Marco MonticonePhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute of Lissone, S. Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS , Lissone, Italy.
Simona FerranteNearlab, Department of Electronics Informatics and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano , Milano, Italy.
Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies advocated the use of active cycling coupled with functional electrical stimulation to induce neuroplasticity and enhance functional improvements in stroke adult patients. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the benefits induced by such a treatment are superior to standard physiotherapy. A single-blinded randomized controlled trial has been performed on post-acute elderly stroke patients. Patients underwent FES-augmented cycling training combined with voluntary pedaling or standard physiotherapy. The intervention consisted of fifteen 30-minutes sessions carried out within 3 weeks. Patients were evaluated before and after training, through functional scales, gait analysis and a voluntary pedaling test. Results were compared with an age-matched healthy group. Sixteen patients completed the training. After treatment, a general improvement of all clinical scales was obtained for both groups. Only the mechanical efficiency highlighted a group effect in favor of the experimental group. Although a group effect was not found for any other cycling or gait parameters, the experimental group showed a higher percentage of change with respect to the control group (e.g. the gait velocity was improved of 35.4% and 25.4% respectively, and its variation over time was higher than minimal clinical difference for the experimental group only). This trend suggests that differences in terms of motor recovery between the two groups may be achieved increasing the training dose. In conclusion, this study, although preliminary, showed that FES-augmented active cycling training seems to be effective in improving cycling and walking ability in post-acute elderly stroke patients. A higher sample size is required to confirm results.

Indexed as

active cycling coupled with functional electrical stimulationsingle-blinded randomized controlled

Identifiers

PMID27990234
PMCPMC5128967
OpenAlexW2470134711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.