ReviewJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2016
Robotic surgery in gynecology.
Review in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- The need for adaptive laparoscopic training, depending on conventional and robotic procedures. Evidence from an experimental profiling study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Comparative Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in the implementation of a new robotic system - a semi-structured interview study with a surgical team.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Implementation of a new robotic system: challenges for the surgical team and ethical concerns about patient safety, a longitudinal questionnaire study.BMJ connections surgery · 2026Article
- Breaking the Pain Cycle: Hydroflotation With Promethazine and Dexamethasone for Post-laparoscopic Shoulder Pain.Cureus · 2025Article
- Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: is there a correlation between uterine diameters, pelvic volume, and surgical outcomes?Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- [Brief history and application prospect of robotic spine surgery].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- The first robotic-assisted hysterectomy below the bikini line with the Dexter robotic system™.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Expanding Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology Using the Potential of an Advanced Robotic System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- [The Importance of Feedback in Proctoring in Robotic Surgery - a Cornerstone of the Concept of Success?]Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie · 2023Article
- Preclinical evaluation of the Versius surgical system: A next-generation surgical robot for use in minimal access prostate surgery.BJUI compass · 2023Article
- Robotic-assisted abdominal aortic surgery: evidence and techniques.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Review
- Robotic Surgery: The Future of Gynaecology.Cureus · 2022Review
- Robot-Assisted Tubal Reanastomosis after Sterilization: A Choice for Family Planning.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Assessment of the Versius Robotic Surgical System in Minimal Access Surgery: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2022Article
- A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2022Article
- Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Review
- Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery is the most dynamic development in the sector of minimally invasive operations currently. It should not be viewed as an alternative to laparoscopy, but as the next step in a process of technological evolution. The advancement of robotic surgery, in terms of the introduction of the Da Vinci Xi, permits the variable use of optical devices in all four trocars. Due to the new geometry of the "patient cart," an operation can be performed in all spatial directions without re-docking. Longer instruments and the markedly narrower mechanical elements of the "patient cart" provide greater flexibility as well as access similar to those of traditional laparoscopy. Currently, robotic surgery is used for a variety of indications in the treatment of benign gynecological diseases as well as malignant ones. Interdisciplinary cooperation and cooperation over large geographical distances have been rendered possible by telemedicine, and will ensure comprehensive patient care in the future by highly specialized surgery teams. In addition, the second operation console and the operation simulator constitute a new dimension in advanced surgical training. The disadvantages of robotic surgery remain the high costs of acquisition and maintenance as well as the laborious training of medical personnel before they are confident with using the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.