ReviewAustralian prescriber2016
Long-term prescribing of new oral anticoagulants.
Review in Australian prescriber, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- [Risk of bleeding-Strategies for prevention and treatment].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Drugs in secondary stroke prevention.Australian prescriber · 2021Review
- A Review of the Incidence Diagnosis and Treatment of Spontaneous Hemorrhage in Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- Precision dosing to avoid adverse drug reactions.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2019Article
- Management of Elective Surgery and Emergent Bleeding with Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Current cardiology reports · 2017Review
- Pharmacokinetics of apixaban.Australian prescriber · 2017Article
- Treating patients on new anticoagulant drugs.Australian prescriber · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.