Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27990019›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2017

Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock.

Joseph S Takahashi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,558 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,558citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
63.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,558 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2,548 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1,498 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joseph S TakahashiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, NA4.118, Dallas, Texas 75390-9111, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Transcriptional Architecture and Chromatin Landscape of Circadian Clocks in AgingR01AG045795 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GREEN, CARLA B., TAKAHASHI, JOSEPH S · 2013 to 2017
$1.5M
Identification of human-relevant CLOCK molecular signaling pathwaysR21MH107672 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KONOPKA, GENEVIEVE · 2015 to 2016
$445k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIA NIH HHS R01 AG045795NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH107672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circadian clocks are endogenous oscillators that control 24-hour physiological and behavioural processes in organisms. These cell-autonomous clocks are composed of a transcription-translation-based autoregulatory feedback loop. With the development of next-generation sequencing approaches, biochemical and genomic insights into circadian function have recently come into focus. Genome-wide analyses of the clock transcriptional feedback loop have revealed a global circadian regulation of processes such as transcription factor occupancy, RNA polymerase II recruitment and initiation, nascent transcription, and chromatin remodelling. The genomic targets of circadian clocks are pervasive and are intimately linked to the regulation of metabolism, cell growth and physiology.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticTranscription, GeneticAnimalsChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyCircadian ClocksGene Expression ProfilingGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMammalsRNA Polymerase IIRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID27990019
PMCPMC5501165
OpenAlexW2567503091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.