Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27989653›Full record

ArticleJournal of physiology, Paris2016

Co-adaptation of electric organ discharges and chirps in South American ghost knifefishes (Apteronotidae).

Jacquelyn M Petzold, Gary Marsat, G Troy Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physiology, Paris, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacquelyn M PetzoldDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. 3rd St., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, 409 N. Park Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: jpetzold@indiana.edu.
Gary MarsatDepartment of Biology, West Virginia University, 53 Campus Dr., Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
G Troy SmithDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 E. 3rd St., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA; Center for the Integrative Study of Animal Behavior, Indiana University, 409 N. Park Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

Common Themes in Reproductive DiversityT32HD049336 · NICHD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI DALE R SENGELAUB · 2005 to 2026
$4.4M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD049336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal communication signals that simultaneously share the same sensory channel are likely to co-evolve to maximize the transmission of each signal component. Weakly electric fish continuously produce a weak electric field that functions in communication. Fish modulate the electric organ discharge (EOD) on short timescales to produce context-specific signals called chirps. EODs and chirps are simultaneously detected by electroreceptors and processed in the electrosensory system. We analyzed these signals, first to explore whether EOD waveform is encoded in the signal received by electroreceptors and then to examine how EODs and chirps interact to influence conspicuousness. Our findings show that gross discrimination of sinusoidal from complex EOD waveforms is feasible for all species, but fine discrimination of waveform may be possible only for species with waveforms of intermediate complexity. The degree of chirp frequency modulation and chirp relative decay strongly influenced chirp conspicuousness, but other chirp parameters were less influential. The frequency difference between the interacting EODs also strongly impacted chirp conspicuousness. Finally, we developed a method for creating hybrid chirp/EOD combinations to independently analyze the impact of chirp species, EOD species, and EOD difference frequency on chirp conspicuousness. All three components and their interactions strongly influenced chirp conspicuousness, which suggests that evolutionary changes in parameters of either chirps or EODs are likely to influence chirp detection. Examining other environmental factors such as noise created by fish movement and species-typical patterns of sociality may enrich our understanding of how interacting EODs affect the detection and discrimination of chirps across species.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiological EvolutionElectric OrganElectromagnetic PhenomenaGymnotiformesSouth AmericaChirpingCo-evolutionConspicuousnessSignalWeakly electric fish

Identifiers

PMID27989653
PMCPMC5408315
OpenAlexW2545679192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.