ArticleEvaluation and program planning2017
Costs of promoting cancer screening: Evidence from CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP).
Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- Costs and outcomes of colorectal cancer screening program in Isfahan, Iran.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Integrated interventions and supporting activities to increase uptake of multiple cancer screenings: conceptual framework, determinants of implementation success, measurement challenges, and research priorities.Implementation science communications · 2022Article
- Yield of Post-Acute Diverticulitis Colonoscopy for Ruling Out Colorectal Cancer.Techniques and innovations in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2022Article
- Creating a Workplace Culture of Preventive Health: Process and Outcomes of the Colon Cancer-Free Zone at Virginia Cooperative Extension.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Article
- Economic Evaluation of Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening at Federally Qualified Health Centers.Health promotion practice · 2020Article
- Adoption and Implementation of Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions Among Cancer Control Program Grantees, 2009-2015.Preventing chronic disease · 2019Article
- The impact of screening on the survival of colorectal cancer in Shanghai, China: a population based study.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Expenditures on Screening Promotion Activities in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009-2014.Preventing chronic disease · 2019Article
- Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs.Preventing chronic disease · 2019Article
- Identifying optimal approaches to scale up colorectal cancer screening: an overview of the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC)'s learning laboratory.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2019Review
- Article
- Observational
- Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening in Health Care Systems Using Evidence-Based Interventions.Preventing chronic disease · 2018Article
- Importance of implementation economics for program planning-evaluation of CDC's colorectal cancer control program.Evaluation and program planning · 2017Article
- Costs of colorectal cancer screening provision in CDC's Colorectal Cancer Control Program: Comparisons of colonoscopy and FOBT/FIT based screening.Evaluation and program planning · 2017Article
- Costs of Implementing Teen Dating Violence and Youth Violence Prevention Strategies: Evidence From 5 CDC-Funded Local Health Departments.Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) provided funding to 29 grantees to increase colorectal cancer screening. We describe the screening promotion costs of CRCCP grantees to evaluate the extent to which the program model resulted in the use of funding to support interventions recommended by the Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide). We analyzed expenditures for screening promotion for the first three years of the CRCCP to assess cost per promotion strategy, and estimated the cost per person screened at the state level based on various projected increases in screening rates. All grantees engaged in small media activities and more than 90% used either client reminders, provider assessment and feedback, or patient navigation. Based on all expenditures, projected cost per eligible person screened for a 1%, 5%, and 10% increase in state-level screening proportions are $172, $34, and $17, respectively. CRCCP grantees expended the majority of their funding on Community Guide recommended screening promotion strategies but about a third was spent on other interventions. Based on this finding, future CRC programs should be provided with targeted education and information on evidence-based strategies, rather than broad based recommendations, to ensure that program funds are expended mainly on evidence-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.