Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27989399›Full record

Trial reportHeart & lung : the journal of critical care

The long term impact of an end-of-life communication intervention among veterans with COPD.

Lynn F Reinke, Laura C Feemster, Jennifer McDowell, Eric Gunnink, Erica V Tartaglione, Edmunds Udris, J Randall Curtis, David H Au

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Advance Care Planning on End-of-Life Decision Making: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Han'guk Hosup'isu Wanhwa Uiryo Hakhoe chi = The Korean journal of hospice and palliative care · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lynn F ReinkeDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA; University of Washington, School of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, USA. Electronic address: reinkl@uw.edu.
Laura C FeemsterDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA; University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, USA.
Jennifer McDowellDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA.
Eric GunninkDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA.
Erica V TartaglioneDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA.
Edmunds UdrisDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA.
J Randall CurtisUniversity of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, USA.
David H AuDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Health Services R&D, USA; University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, USA.

Funding

Facilitating adoption of COPD evidence-based care in outpatient settings (FACES)K23HL111116 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FEEMSTER, LAURA CECERE · 2013 to 2017
$481k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL111116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess if an end-of-life communication intervention with patients with COPD led to higher long-term documentation of advance care planning discussions at the end-of-life.

backgroundWe previously demonstrated that providing clinicians a patient-specific feedback form about patients' communication preferences improved the occurrence and quality of clinician communication about end-of-life care.

methodsAmong those individuals enrolled in the intervention study (2004-2007) who had died during the follow-up period (up to 2013), we assessed if patients in the intervention arm had more goals of care discussions and formal advance directives completed as compared to controls. We conducted logistic models accounting for provider level clustering, adjusting for age, FEV

resultsAmong the 376 patients in the study, 157 died (76 in the intervention arm, 81 in the control arm). Over an average duration of 3.6 years (from the time of the first study appointment to death), 115 (73%) patients engaged in 451 unique end-of-life care discussions. The intervention was not associated with a higher percentage of patients with documented end-of-life conversations (I:C 75% vs 72%, p = 0.63) or completion of advance care directives (26% vs 29%, p = 0.55).

conclusionsDespite initially improving the occurrence of end-of-life conversations, the intervention did not increase the documentation of subsequent conversations about end-of-life care, nor did it improve documentation of advance directives. Future research should focus on testing multi-faceted, longitudinal, system-level interventions to enhance conversations about goals of care that promote goal-concurrent care.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningPhysician-Patient RelationsVeteransAdvance DirectivesAgedFemaleHumansMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient PreferencePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareAdvance care planningChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)Clinician communication skillsEnd of life communicationIntervention

Identifiers

PMID27989399
PMCPMC5581983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.