ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
Fingerprint changes among cancer patients treated with paclitaxel.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A scalable multimodal graph neural network for drug combination response prediction.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Development, detection and decipherment of obfuscated fingerprints in humans: Implications for forensic casework.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2023Review
- Interpol review of fingermarks and other body impressions 2016-2019.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFingerprints have long been used for personal identification; however, some case reports suggested that some chemotherapy agents such as paclitaxel lead to fingerprints loss due to hand-and-foot syndrome (HFS).
methodsThis case-control study was performed on 65 patients who received chemotherapy regimens with/without paclitaxel. Patients with the history of receiving any drugs with significant HFS adverse effect or patients with any conditions that affect fingerprints were excluded. Baseline and post-chemotherapy images of fingerprint examples were referred to the Iranian Society of Legal Medicine to compare changes in the fingerprints.
resultsThirty-one patients entered in the paclitaxel and 34 subjects in the control groups. Seventeen patients (54.8%) in the paclitaxel group experienced fingerprint changes, whereas no patient had fingerprint changes in the control group. By physical examination, no patients in the two groups experienced HFS. After adjusting for age, sex, occupation, and cancer type, there was a significant difference between the two groups regarding fingerprint changes (P = 0.002, OR 13.69, 95% CI 2.05 to infinite).
conclusionsConsidering that fingerprint recognition has been utilized in both government and civilian investigation, patients taking paclitaxel and centers necessitating fingerprint identification should be informed about possible fingerprint changes by paclitaxel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.