Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27987484›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2017

Social relationships in young adults at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Briana L Robustelli, Raeana E Newberry, Mark A Whisman, Vijay A Mittal

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploring causal mechanisms of psychosis risk.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Briana L RobustelliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, United States. Electronic address: briana.robustelli@colorado.edu.
Raeana E NewberryDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, United States.
Mark A WhismanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, 345 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0345, United States.
Vijay A MittalDepartment of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Swift Hall 102, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, United States.
University of Colorado Boulder · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

Frontal-Subcortical Development, Movement Abnormalities, and Risk for PsychosisR01MH094650 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2011 to 2015
$2.3M
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR33MH103231 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2016 to 2018
$689k
Exercise and markers of medial temporal health in youth at-risk for psychosisR21MH103231 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BRYAN, ANGELA, MITTAL, VIJAY A · 2014 to 2015
$489k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094650NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH103231NIMH NIH HHS R33 MH103231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies suggest that individuals with schizophrenia have smaller social networks and less satisfying relationships. However, much is still unknown about the typical quantity and quality of social relationships in young adults during the ultra high-risk (UHR) period. Investigating these relationships holds significant importance for improving understanding of etiological processes, mapping the social environment, and highlighting treatment targets in a critical period. A total of 85 participants (44 UHR and 41 healthy controls) completed measures examining the participants' social relationships, social support, and loneliness. Mean differences between the UHR and healthy control participants and associations between social relationships and symptoms and functioning were examined. Results indicated significant differences between groups on several indices. Specifically, the UHR youth reported fewer close friends, less diverse social networks, less perceived social support, poorer relationship quality with family and friends, and more loneliness. Notably, within the UHR group, being lonely and having fewer and worse quality relationships was associated with greater symptom severity and lower overall functioning. This study suggests that youth at high-risk of developing psychosis have fewer and poorer quality social relationships. Interventions that focus on increasing the quantity and quality of young adults' social networks may be beneficial for this population.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSocial BehaviorSocial SupportAdolescentCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalePsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsYoung AdultNegative symptomsPositive symptomsPsychosisSocial networksSocial support

Identifiers

PMID27987484
PMCPMC5217827
OpenAlexW2559815495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.