ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2017
The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-a stepwise procedure and learning curve.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Surgery today · 2019Pooled it
- Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC gastroenterology · 2017Pooled it
- Institutional learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: a consecutive 100-case analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning HRNet FCN for blood vessel identification in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of middle colic artery as a landmark for superior mesenteric artery - first approach in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Application of the superior mesenteric artery-first approach in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: A literature review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- The learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy by a proficient laparoscopic surgeon: a retrospective study at a single center.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- First assistant experience in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: accelerating the learning curve for an operator.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Long- and short-term survival following laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with periampullary tumors in Vietnam.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2020Review
- Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy-feasibility study of a modified 'artery first' approach to pancreatic head cancer.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2017Article
- Minimally invasive pancreatic cancer surgery: What is the current evidence?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) has been proven feasible and safe. The artery-first approach emerged as a standard procedure in pancreatic surgery. In this manuscript, we describe both our stepwise, artery-first technique for LPD and methods for accumulating experience during the initial learning stage.
methodThis is a retrospective review of 12 patients who underwent LPD between 2012 and 2015. We classified the first five patients as the early group and the remaining seven as the late group. Here, we present our stepwise procedure for LPD, along with the perioperative results and postoperative prognoses for the two groups.
resultsThe mean operative time for the 12 patients undergoing LPD was 408.3 ± 97.5 min. The average blood loss was 146.7 ± 90.2 mL. The dissection time (T
conclusionArtery-first LPD is a feasible procedure for selected patients and has acceptable results. Using this stepwise procedure, the operative time could be reduced, mainly by reducing the time required for dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.