Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27987073›Full record

ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2017

Comparison of Four Protocols to Generate Chondrocyte-Like Cells from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (hiPSCs).

Wiktoria Maria Suchorska, Ewelina Augustyniak, Magdalena Richter, Tomasz Trzeciak

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cell-Based Therapies for Degenerative Musculoskeletal Diseases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Chondrogenic Differentiation of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wiktoria Maria SuchorskaRadiobiology Lab, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61- 866, Poznan, Poland.
Ewelina AugustyniakRadiobiology Lab, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, 61- 866, Poznan, Poland. ewelina.augustyniak@wco.pl.
Magdalena RichterDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-545, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz TrzeciakDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-545, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLGreater Poland Cancer Center · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells (SCs) are a promising approach to regenerative medicine, with the potential to treat numerous orthopedic disorders, including osteo-degenerative diseases. The development of human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) has increased the potential of SCs for new treatments. However, current methods of differentiating hiPSCs into chondrocyte-like cells are suboptimal and better methods are needed. The aim of the present study was to assess four different chondrogenic differentiation protocols to identify the most efficient method of generating hiPSC-derived chondrocytes. For this study, hiPSCs were obtained from primary human dermal fibroblasts (PHDFs) and differentiated into chondrocyte-like cells using four different protocols: 1) monolayer culture with defined growth factors (GF); 2) embryoid bodies (EBs) in a chondrogenic medium with TGF-β3 cells; 3) EBs in chondrogenic medium conditioned with human chondrocytes (HC-402-05a cell line) and 4) EBs in chondrogenic medium conditioned with human chondrocytes and supplemented with TGF-β3. The cells obtained through these four protocols were evaluated and compared at the mRNA and protein levels. Although chondrogenic differentiation of hiPSCs was successfully achieved with all of these protocols, the two fastest and most cost-effective methods were the monolayer culture with GFs and the medium conditioned with human chondrocytes. Both of these methods are superior to other available techniques. The main advantage of the conditioned medium is that the technique is relatively simple and inexpensive while the directed method (i.e., monolayer culture with GFs) is faster than any protocol described to date because it is does not require additional steps such as EB formation.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondrogenesisCulture Media, ConditionedEmbryoid BodiesGene ExpressionHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMicroscopy, FluorescenceReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXD Transcription FactorsCulture Media, ConditionedSOX6 protein, humanSOX9 protein, humanSOX9 Transcription FactorSOXD Transcription FactorsCell differentiationChondrocytesHuman induced pluripotent stem cellsRegenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID27987073
PMCPMC5380716
OpenAlexW2563190195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.