Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986855›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

miSTAR: miRNA target prediction through modeling quantitative and qualitative miRNA binding site information in a stacked model structure.

Gert Van Peer, Ayla De Paepe, Michiel Stock, Jasper Anckaert, Pieter-Jan Volders, Jo Vandesompele, Bernard De Baets, Willem Waegeman

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Computational Detection of MicroRNA Targets.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Prediction of the miRNA interactome - Established methods and upcoming perspectives.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. T-ALL and thymocytes: a message of noncoding RNAs.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gert Van PeerCenter for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ayla De PaepeResearch Unit Knowledge-based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Michiel StockResearch Unit Knowledge-based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Jasper AnckaertCenter for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Pieter-Jan VoldersCenter for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Jo VandesompeleCenter for Medical Genetics Ghent (CMGG), Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Bernard De BaetsResearch Unit Knowledge-based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Willem WaegemanResearch Unit Knowledge-based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Mathematical Modeling, Statistics and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In microRNA (miRNA) target prediction, typically two levels of information need to be modeled: the number of potential miRNA binding sites present in a target mRNA and the genomic context of each individual site. Single model structures insufficiently cope with this complex training data structure, consisting of feature vectors of unequal length as a consequence of the varying number of miRNA binding sites in different mRNAs. To circumvent this problem, we developed a two-layered, stacked model, in which the influence of binding site context is separately modeled. Using logistic regression and random forests, we applied the stacked model approach to a unique data set of 7990 probed miRNA-mRNA interactions, hereby including the largest number of miRNAs in model training to date. Compared to lower-complexity models, a particular stacked model, named miSTAR (miRNA stacked model target prediction; www.mi-star.org), displays a higher general performance and precision on top scoring predictions. More importantly, our model outperforms published and widely used miRNA target prediction algorithms. Finally, we highlight flaws in cross-validation schemes for evaluation of miRNA target prediction models and adopt a more fair and stringent approach.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated RegionsModels, GeneticAlgorithmsBinding SitesHumansMachine LearningMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerSoftware3' Untranslated RegionsMicroRNAsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID27986855
PMCPMC5397177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.