Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986820›Full record

ArticleGenome research2017

Identification of complex genomic rearrangements in cancers using CouGaR.

Misko Dzamba, Arun K Ramani, Pawel Buczkowicz, Yue Jiang, Man Yu, Cynthia Hawkins, Michael Brudno

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chromoplexy: A Pathway to Genomic Complexity and Cancer Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Chromoplexy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Chromothripsis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Complex Variant Discovery Using Discordant Cluster Normalization.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toward Recovering Allele-specific Cancer Genome Graphs.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Identifying simultaneous rearrangements in cancer genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Misko DzambaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G4, Canada.
Arun K RamaniCentre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Pawel BuczkowiczDivision of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1E8, Canada.
Yue JiangCentre for Computational Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Man YuDivision of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1E8, Canada.
Cynthia HawkinsDivision of Pathology, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1E8, Canada.
Michael BrudnoDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G4, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genomic alterations associated with cancers are numerous and varied, involving both isolated and large-scale complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs). Although the underlying mechanisms are not well understood, CGRs have been implicated in tumorigenesis. Here, we introduce CouGaR, a novel method for characterizing the genomic structure of amplified CGRs, leveraging both depth of coverage (DOC) and discordant pair-end mapping techniques. We applied our method to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas and identify amplified CGRs in at least 5.2% (10+ copies) to 17.8% (6+ copies) of the samples. Furthermore, ∼95% of these amplified CGRs contain genes previously implicated in tumorigenesis, indicating the importance and widespread occurrence of CGRs in cancers. Additionally, CouGaR identified the occurrence of 'chromoplexy' in nearly 63% of all prostate cancer samples and 30% of all bladder cancer samples. To further validate the accuracy of our method, we experimentally tested 17 predicted fusions in two pediatric glioma samples and validated 15 of these (88%) with precise resolution of the breakpoints via qPCR experiments and Sanger sequencing, with nearly perfect copy count concordance. Additionally, to further help display and understand the structure of CGRs, we have implemented CouGaR-viz, a generic stand-alone tool for visualization of the copy count of regions, breakpoints, and relevant genes.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisComputational BiologyGene RearrangementGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27986820
PMCPMC5204335
OpenAlexW2555719318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.