Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986755›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Vinayak Nagaraja, Sze-Yuan Ooi, James Nolan, Adrian Large, Mark De Belder, Peter Ludman, Rodrigo Bagur, Nick Curzen, Takashi Matsukage, Fuminobu Yoshimachi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Irretrievable wire wrap and catheter entrapment: Novel failure mode of endobypass device.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The relative impact of components of high residual risk on the long-term prognosis after AMI.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Narrowing disparities in PCI outcomes in women; From risk assessment, to referral pathways and outcomes.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Vinayak NagarajaDepartment of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sze-Yuan OoiDepartment of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
James NolanRoyal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Adrian LargeRoyal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Mark De BelderThe James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.
Peter LudmanQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Rodrigo BagurDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Nick CurzenUniversity Hospital Southampton & Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, United Kingdom.
Takashi MatsukageDivision of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Fuminobu YoshimachiDivision of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Chun Shing KwokRoyal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.
Colin BerryInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Mamas A MamasRoyal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom mamasmamas1@yahoo.co.uk.
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBPrince of Wales Hospital · AUTokai University · JPJames Cook University Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBSouthampton Hospital · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBWestern University · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N003403/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to half of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) with conflicting data regarding optimal revascularization strategy in such patients. This paper assesses the evidence for complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and its prognostic impact using meta-analysis. METHODS AND

resultsA search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was conducted to identify the association of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with major adverse cardiac events and mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the odds of adverse outcomes. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship with continuous variables and outcomes. Thirty-eight publications that included 156 240 patients were identified. Odds of death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.78), repeat revascularization (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.80), myocardial infarction (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50-0.81), and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.79) were significantly lower in the patients who underwent CR. These outcomes were unchanged on subgroup analysis regardless of the definition of CR. Similar findings were recorded when CR was studied in the chronic total occlusion (CTO) subgroup (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.80). A meta-regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between the OR for mortality and the percentage of CR.

conclusionCR is associated with reduced risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac events, irrespective of whether an anatomical or a score-based definition of incomplete revascularization is used, and this magnitude of risk relates to degree of CR. These results have important implications for the interventional management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary OcclusionFemaleGraft Occlusion, VascularHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial RevascularizationPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPublication BiasRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegression AnalysisReoperationRisk FactorsStentscomplete revascularizationincomplete revascularizationmajor adverse cardiovascular eventsmortalitypercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID27986755
PMCPMC5210416
OpenAlexW2566087446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.