Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986742›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2016

Assessment of the effectiveness and safety of Ethosuximide in the Treatment of non-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: EDONOT-protocol of a randomised, parallel, controlled, double-blinded and multicentre clinical trial.

Nicolas Kerckhove, Christophe Mallet, Bruno Pereira, Chouki Chenaf, Christian Duale, Claude Dubray, Alain Eschalier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02100046 (Assessment of the Effectiveness of Ethosuximide in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02100046 phase2completednot on this map

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Ethosuximide in the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2014 to 2017Enrolled114ConditionsNeuropathic Traumatic Pain, Pain NRS ≥ 4, Peripheral Neuropathic Pain, Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4) ≥ 4ArmsZarontin® (ethosuximide) and Stodal®
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolas KerckhoveService de Pharmacologie/Toxicologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christophe MalletClermont Université, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bruno PereiraCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Direction de la Recherche Clinique et des Innovations, villa annexe IFSI, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Chouki ChenafService de Pharmacologie/Toxicologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christian DualeCHU Clermont-Ferrand, Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Claude DubrayClermont Université, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Alain EschalierService de Pharmacologie/Toxicologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRInserm · FRNeuro-Dol · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCurrently available analgesics are ineffective in 30-50% of patients suffering from neuropathic pain and often induce deleterious side effects. T-type calcium channel blockers (mibefradil, ethosuximide, NNC 55-0396) are of great interest for the development of new symptomatic treatments of neuropathic pain, due to their various effects on pain perception. Interestingly, ethosuximide, which has already been approved for treating epilepsy, is available on the European market for clinical use. Despite numerous preclinical data demonstrating an antinociceptive effect of ethosuximide in various animal models of neuropathic pain, no clinical studies have been published to date on the analgesic efficacy of ethosuximide in patients with neuropathic pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Ethosuximide in the Treatment of non-Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (EDONOT) trial is a randomised, parallel, controlled, double-blinded, multicentre clinical study. It is the first clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ethosuximide in the treatment of non-diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain. Adult patients exhibiting peripheral neuropathic pain (Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ≥4 and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4)≥4) for at least 3 months and under stable analgesic treatment for at least 1 month will be included. Patients (n=220) will be randomly assigned to receive either ethosuximide or control treatment for 6 weeks following a 1 week run-in period. The primary end point is the intensity of neuropathic pain, assessed by NRS (0-10) before and after 6 weeks of treatment. The secondary end points are safety (adverse events are collected during the study: daily by the patient on the logbook and during planned phone calls by investigators), the intensity and features of neuropathic pain (assessed by Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) questionnaires) and health-related quality of life (assessed by Medical Outcome Study Short Form 12 (MOS SF-12) and Leeds questionnaires). ETHICS AND COMMUNICATION: The study was approved by an independent ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est VI, France, IRB00008526) and registered by the French competent authority (Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament (ANSM)). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02100046, Recruiting.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnalgesicsDouble-Blind MethodEthosuximideFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuralgiaQuality of LifeRegression AnalysisResearch DesignAnalgesicsEthosuximideethosuximidePAIN MANAGEMENTT-type calcium channels

Identifiers

PMID27986742
PMCPMC5168699
OpenAlexW2561584318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.