Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986604›Full record

ReviewTranslational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine2017

Cell therapy for the degenerating intervertebral disc.

Wei Tong, Zhouyu Lu, Ling Qin, Robert L Mauck, Harvey E Smith, Lachlan J Smith, Neil R Malhotra, Martin F Heyworth, Franklin Caldera, Motomi Enomoto-Iwamoto and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wei TongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Orthopaedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R.China.
Zhouyu LuDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Ling QinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Robert L MauckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center (TMRC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa.
Harvey E SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center (TMRC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa.
Lachlan J SmithDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Neil R MalhotraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Martin F HeyworthResearch Service, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Franklin CalderaDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Motomi Enomoto-IwamotoDepartment of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
Yejia ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Translational Musculoskeletal Research Center (TMRC), Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pa. Electronic address: yejia.zhang@uphs.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUnion Hospital · CN

Funding

Mechanism of radiotherapy-induced osteoporosis and its treatmentR01AR066098 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI QIN, LING · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
Role of EGFR signaling in bone formation and the anabolic actions of PTHR01DK095803 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI QIN, LING · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Cell Therapy for the degenerating intervertebral discsK08HD049598 · NICHD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI ZHANG, YEJIA · 2007 to 2010
$566k
The role of amphiregulin in PTH's action on boneK01DK071988 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI QIN, LING · 2005 to 2008
$531k
EGFR signaling in growth plate developmentR03AR060991 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI QIN, LING · 2012 to 2014
$234k
Tissue-Engineered Constructs for Treatment of Intervertebral Disc DegenerationIK2RX001476 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, HARVEY E. · 2015 to 2020
–
Cell Therapy for the Degenerating Intervertebral DiscI21RX001896 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHANG, YEJIA · 2016 to 2017
–
Bioactive Injectable Implants for Functional Intervertebral Disc RegenerationI01RX001321 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Robert L Mauck, Lachlan James Smith · 2014 to 2026
–
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066098NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR060991NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD049598NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK071988NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK095803RRD VA I01 RX001321RRD VA I21 RX001896RRD VA IK2 RX001476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal conditions related to intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration cost billions of dollars in the US annually. Despite the prevalence and soaring cost, there is no specific treatment that restores the physiological function of the diseased IVD. Thus, it is vital to develop new treatment strategies to repair the degenerating IVD. Persons with IVD degeneration without back pain or radicular leg pain often do not require any intervention. Only patients with severe back pain related to the IVD degeneration or biomechanical instability are likely candidates for cell therapy. The IVD progressively degenerates with age in humans, and strategies to repair the IVD depend on the stage of degeneration. Cell therapy and cell-based gene therapy aim to address moderate disc degeneration; advanced stage disease may require surgery. Studies involving autologous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic cells have all shown good survival of these cells in the IVD, confirming that the disc niche is an immunologically privileged site, permitting long-term survival of transplanted cells. All of the animal studies reviewed here reported some improvement in disc structure, and 2 studies showed attenuation of local inflammation. Among the 50 studies reviewed, 25 used some type of scaffold, and cell leakage is a consistently noted problem, though some studies showed reduced cell leakage. Hydrogel scaffolds may prevent cell leakage and provide biomechanical support until cells can become established matrix producers. However, these gels need to be optimized to prevent this leakage. Many animal models have been leveraged in this research space. Rabbit is the most frequently used model (28 of 50), followed by rat, pig, and dog. Sheep and goat IVDs resemble those of humans in size and in the absence of notochordal cells. Despite this advantage, there were only 2 sheep and 1 goat studies of 50 studies in this cohort. It is also unclear if a study in large animals is needed before clinical trials since some of the clinical trials proceeded without a study in large animals. No animal studies or clinical trials completely restored IVD structure. However, results suggest cause for optimism. In light of the fact that patients primarily seek medical care for back pain, attenuating local inflammation should be a priority in benchmarks for success. Clinicians generally agree that short-term back pain should be treated conservatively. When interventions are considered, the ideal therapy should also be minimally invasive and concurrent with other procedures such as discography or discectomy. Restoration of tissue structure and preservation of spinal motion are desirable.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyAnimalsBack PainDisease Models, AnimalHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationPatient SelectionTissue Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID27986604
PMCPMC5776755
OpenAlexW2559525415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.