Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986534›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2017

Mechanical Communication at the Immunological Synapse.

Roshni Basu, Morgan Huse

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mechanoimmunological Control of Metastatic Site Selection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Unleashing the power of antigen-presenting neutrophils.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roshni BasuImmunology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Morgan HuseImmunology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: husem@mskcc.org.

Funding

Synaptic Control of Cytotoxic T cell FunctionR01AI087644 · NIAID · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI HUSE, MORGAN A · 2010 to 2025
$7.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI087644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T and B lymphocytes communicate by forming immunological synapses with antigen-presenting target cells. These highly dynamic contacts are characterized by continuous cytoskeletal remodeling events, which not only structure the interface but also exert a considerable amount of mechanical force. In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that synaptic forces influence information transfer both into and out of the lymphocyte. Here, we review our current understanding of synapse mechanics, focusing on its role as an avenue for intercellular communication.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansImmunological SynapsesIntegrinsReceptors, ImmunologicIntegrinsReceptors, ImmunologicB cellimmunologymechanobiologysignal transductionT cell

Identifiers

PMID27986534
PMCPMC5367987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.