Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986344›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2017

Decreased Lung Perfusion After Breast/Chest Wall Irradiation: Quantitative Results From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Adam L Liss, Robin B Marsh, Nirav S Kapadia, Daniel L McShan, Virginia E Rogers, James M Balter, Jean M Moran, Kristy K Brock, Matt J Schipper, Reshma Jagsi and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer: preferences amongst radiation oncologists from countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam L LissDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: adamliss68@gmail.com.
Robin B MarshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Nirav S KapadiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Daniel L McShanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Virginia E RogersDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
James M BalterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jean M MoranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kristy K BrockDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Matt J SchipperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Reshma JagsiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kent A GriffithBiostatistics Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kevin R FlahertyDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Kirk A FreyDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lori J PierceDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · US

Funding

IMRT in the Treatment of Node-Positive Breast CancerR01CA102435 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIERCE, LORI J · 2004 to 2006
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102435
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantify lung perfusion changes after breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) using pre- and post-RT single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) attenuation-corrected perfusion scans; and correlate decreased perfusion with adjuvant RT dose for breast cancer in a prospective clinical trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: As part of an institutional review board-approved trial studying the impact of RT technique on lung function in node-positive breast cancer, patients received breast/chest wall and regional nodal irradiation including superior internal mammary node RT to 50 to 52.2 Gy with a boost to the tumor bed/mastectomy scar. All patients underwent quantitative SPECT/CT lung perfusion scanning before RT and 1 year after RT. The SPECT/CT scans were co-registered, and the ratio of decreased perfusion after RT relative to the pre-RT perfusion scan was calculated to allow for direct comparison of SPECT/CT perfusion changes with delivered RT dose. The average ratio of decreased perfusion was calculated in 10-Gy dose increments from 0 to 60 Gy.

resultsFifty patients had complete lung SPECT/CT perfusion data available. No patient developed symptoms consistent with pulmonary toxicity. Nearly all patients demonstrated decreased perfusion in the left lung according to voxel-based analyses. The average ratio of lung perfusion deficits increased for each 10-Gy increment in radiation dose to the lung, with the largest changes in regions of lung that received 50 to 60 Gy (ratio 0.72 [95% confidence interval 0.64-0.79], P<.001) compared with the 0- to 10-Gy region. For each increase in 10 Gy to the left lung, the lung perfusion ratio decreased by 0.06 (P<.001).

conclusionsIn the assessment of 50 patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with RT in a prospective clinical trial, decreased lung perfusion by SPECT/CT was demonstrated. Our study allowed for quantification of lung perfusion defects in a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients for whom attenuation-corrected SPECT/CT scans could be registered directly to RT treatment fields for precise dose estimates.

Indexed as

Radiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansLungLymph NodesMastectomyMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesRadiation DosageAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID27986344
PMCPMC5222748
OpenAlexW2535527955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.