Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986084›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016

Harmonisation and standardisation of health sector and programme reviews and evaluations - how can they better inform health policy dialogue?

Juliet Nabyonga-Orem, Prosper Tumusiime, Jennifer Nyoni, Aku Kwamie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Juliet Nabyonga-OremHealth Systems and Services Cluster, Health Systems Governance, World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team for Eastern & Southern Africa, P.O. Box CY 348, Causeway, Harare, Zimbabwe. nabyongaj@who.int.
Prosper TumusiimeHealth Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Jennifer NyoniHealth Systems and Services cluster, World Health Organization Regional office for Africa, BP 06, Cite de Djoue, Brazzaville, Congo.
Aku KwamieGhana Health Service, Research and Development Division, PMB M9, Ministries, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth sector and programme performance assessments provide a rich source of contextual data directly linked to implementation of programmes and can inform health policy dialogue, planning and resource allocation. In seeking to maximise this opportunity, there are challenges to overcome. A meeting convened by the World Health Organization African Region discussed the strengths, weaknesses and challenges to harmonising and standardising health sector and programme performance assessments, as well as use of evidence from such processes in decision making. This article synthesises the deliberations which emerged from the meeting. Discussing these in light of other literature we propose practical options to standardising health sector and programme performance assessment and improve realisation of using evidence in decision making. DISCUSSION: Use of evidence generated from health sector and programme performance assessments into regular country processes of sectoral monitoring, dialogue and policy modification is crucial. However, this process faces several challenges. Identified challenges were categorised under several themes, namely the weak institutional capacities for monitoring and evaluation in reference to weak health information systems, a lack of tools and skills, and weak accountability mechanisms; desynchronised planning timeframes between programme and overall health sector strategies; inadequate time to undertake comprehensive and good quality performance assessment; weak mechanisms for following up on implementation of recommendations; lack of effective stakeholder participation; and divergent political aspirations.

conclusionThe question of what performance assessment is for in a country must be asked and answered clearly if the utility of these processes is to be realised. Standardising programme and sector reviews offers numerable opportunities that need to be maximised. Identified challenges need to be overcome through strengthened Ministry of Health leadership, effective stakeholder engagement and institutionalising follow-up mechanisms for agreed recommendations. In addition, health sector performance assessments need to be institutionalised as part of the accountability mechanism, and they must be planned for and funding secured within annual budget and medium term expenditure frameworks.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth Care SectorHealth PolicyHealth ServicesHealth Services ResearchAfricaDecision MakingEvidence-Based PracticeHumansProgram EvaluationReference StandardsResource AllocationWorld Health OrganizationHealth programmesHealth sectorPerformance assessmentPolicy dialogueUse of evidence

Identifiers

PMID27986084
PMCPMC5162096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.