Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27986078›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Monoplacophoran mitochondrial genomes: convergent gene arrangements and little phylogenetic signal.

I Stöger, K M Kocot, A J Poustka, N G Wilson, D Ivanov, K M Halanych, M Schrödl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molluscan mitochondrial genomes break the rules.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

I StögerSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Muenchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, Munich, Germany. Isabella.Stoeger@zsm.mwn.de.
K M KocotDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Box 870344, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
A J PoustkaMax-Planck Institut fuer Molekulare Genetik, Evolution and Development Group, Ihnestrasse 73, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
N G WilsonWestern Australian Museum, Aquatic Zoology/Molecular Systematics Unit, 49 Kew Street, Welshpool, WA, 6106, Australia.
D IvanovZoological Museum, Moscow State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, 225009, Moscow, Russia.
K M HalanychBiological Sciences Department, Auburn University, Life Sciences Bld. 101, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
M SchrödlSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Muenchhausenstrasse 21, 81247, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough recent studies have greatly advanced understanding of deep molluscan phylogeny, placement of some taxa remains uncertain as different datasets support competing class-relationships. Traditionally, morphologists have placed Monoplacophora, a group of morphologically simple, limpet-like molluscs as sister group to all other conchiferans (shelled molluscs other than Polyplacophora), a grouping that is supported by the latest large-scale phylogenomic study that includes Laevipilina. However, molecular datasets dominated by nuclear ribosomal genes support Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora (Serialia). Here, we evaluate the potential of mitochondrial genome data for resolving placement of Monoplacophora.

resultsTwo complete (Laevipilina antarctica and Vema ewingi) and one partial (Laevipilina hyalina) mitochondrial genomes were sequenced, assembled, and compared. All three genomes show a highly similar architecture including an unusually high number of non-coding regions. Comparison of monoplacophoran gene order shows a gene arrangement pattern not previously reported; there is an inversion of one large gene cluster. Our reanalyses of recently published polyplacophoran mitogenomes show, however, that this feature is also present in some chiton species. Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses of 13 mitochondrial protein-coding genes failed to robustly place Monoplacophora and hypothesis testing could not reject any of the evaluated placements of Monoplacophora.

conclusionsUnder both serialian or aculiferan-conchiferan scenarios, the observed gene cluster inversion appears to be a convergent evolution of gene arrangements in molluscs. Our phylogenetic results are inconclusive and sensitive to taxon sampling. Aculifera (Polyplacophora + Aplacophora) and Conchifera were never recovered. However, some analyses recovered Serialia (Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora), Diasoma (Bivalvia + Scaphopoda) or Pleistomollusca (Bivalvia + Gastropoda). Although we could not shed light on deep evolutionary traits of Mollusca we found unique patterns of gene arrangements that are common to monoplacophoran and chitonine polyplacophoran species but not to acanthochitonine Polyplacophora. Complete mitochondrial genome of Laevipilina antarctica.

Indexed as

Gene OrderGenome, MitochondrialAnimalsBayes TheoremBiological EvolutionBivalviaGastropodaMolluscaMultigene FamilyPhylogenyAculiferaConchiferaEvolutionGene arrangementMitogenomeMolluscaMonoplacophoraPhylogenySerialia

Identifiers

PMID27986078
PMCPMC5162086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.