Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27984679›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2017

Making the cut: Innovative methods for optimizing perfusion-based migration assays.

Andrew W Holt, William E Howard, Elizabeth T Ables, Stephanie M George, Cindy A Kukoly, Jake E Rabidou, Jake T Francisco, Angel N Chukwu, David A Tulis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew W HoltDepartment of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
William E HowardDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Elizabeth T AblesDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Stephanie M GeorgeDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Cindy A KukolyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Jake E RabidouDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Jake T FranciscoDepartment of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
Angel N ChukwuDepartment of Engineering, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
David A TulisDepartment of Physiology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.
East Carolina University · US

Funding

NO-independent cGMP regulation of vascular remodelingR01HL081720 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA CENTRAL UNIVERSITY · PI TULIS, DAVID A · 2007 to 2012
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL081720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Application of fluid shear stress to adherent cells dramatically influences their cytoskeletal makeup and differentially regulates their migratory phenotype. Because cytoskeletal rearrangements are necessary for cell motility and migration, preserving these adaptations under in vitro conditions and in the presence of fluid flow are physiologically essential. With this in mind, parallel plate flow chambers and microchannels are often used to conduct in vitro perfusion experiments. However, both of these systems currently lack capacity to accurately study cell migration in the same location where cells were perfused. The most common perfusion/migration assays involve cell perfusion followed by trypsinization which can compromise adaptive cytoskeletal geometry and lead to misleading phenotypic conclusions. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively highlight some limitations commonly found with currently used cell migration approaches and to introduce two new advances which use additive manufacturing (3D printing) or laser capture microdissection (LCM) technology. The residue-free 3D printed insert allows accurate cell seeding within defined areas, increases cell yield for downstream analyses, and more closely resembles the reported levels of fluid shear stress calculated with computational fluid dynamics as compared to other residue-free cell seeding techniques. The LCM approach uses an ultraviolet laser for "touchless technology" to rapidly and accurately introduce a custom-sized wound area in otherwise inaccessible perfusion microchannels. The wound area introduced by LCM elicits comparable migration characteristics compared to traditional pipette tip-induced injuries. When used in perfusion experiments, both of these newly characterized tools were effective in yielding similar results yet without the limitations of the traditional modalities. These innovative methods provide valuable tools for exploring mechanisms of clinically important aspects of cell migration fundamental to the pathogenesis of many flow-mediated disorders and are applicable to other perfusion-based models where migration is of central importance. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

Stress, MechanicalCell Culture TechniquesCell MovementCytoskeletonHumansPerfusionTrypsinTrypsin3D printingcell migrationcomputational fluid dynamicsfluid shear stresslaser capture microdissectionsmooth muscle cells

Identifiers

PMID27984679
PMCPMC5748888
OpenAlexW2566318055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.