Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27984533›Full record

SynthesisShock (Augusta, Ga.)2017

Prevention or Treatment of Ards With Aspirin: A Review of Preclinical Models and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.

Bernardo Amisa Panka, Harm-Jan de Grooth, Angélique Maria Elisabeth Spoelstra-de Man, Mark R Looney, Pieter-Roel Tuinman

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Diminished plasma levels of GPIb-Frontiers in medicine · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. The 125th Anniversary of Aspirin-The Story Continues.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A hitchhiker's guide through the COVID-19 galaxy.Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Approaches towards fighting the COVID‑19 pandemic (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Bernardo Amisa Panka*Department of Intensive Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands †Department of Intensive Care Medicine, s' Lands Hospitaal Paramaribo, Paramaribo, Suriname ‡Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE) and Institute for Cardiovascular Research (ICAR-VU), Amsterdam, The Netherlands §Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; San Francisco, California.
Harm-Jan de Grooth
Angélique Maria Elisabeth Spoelstra-de Man
Mark R Looney
Pieter-Roel Tuinman
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Platelet and megakaryocyte biology in the normal and injured lungR01HL107386 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LOONEY, MARK ROBERTS · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107386
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threating disorder that contributes significantly to critical illness. No specific pharmacological interventions directed at lung injury itself have proven effective in improving outcome of patients with ARDS. Platelet activation was identified as a key component in ARDS pathophysiology and may provide an opportunity for preventive and therapeutic strategies. We hypothesize that use of acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) may prevent and/or attenuate lung injury.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of preclinical studies and meta-analysis of clinical studies investigating the efficacy of ASA in the setting of lung injury. Medline, embase, and cochrane databases were searched.

resultsThe literature search yielded 1,314 unique articles. Fifteen preclinical studies and eight clinical studies fulfilled the in- and exclusion criteria. In the animal studies, the overall effect of ASA was positive, e.g., ASA improved survival and attenuated inflammation and pulmonary edema. Mechanisms of actions involved, among others, are interference with the neutrophil-platelets interaction, reduction of leukotrienes, neutrophil extracellular traps, and prostaglandins. High-dose ASA may be the drug of choice. A meta-analysis of three clinical studies showed an association between ASA use and a reduced incidence of ARDS (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.98), albeit with substantial between-study heterogeneity. All studies had their own shortcomings in methodological quality.

conclusionThis systematic review of preclinical studies and meta-analysis of clinical studies suggests a beneficial role for ASA in ARDS prevention and treatment. However, the currently available data is insufficient to justify an indication for ASA in ARDS. The body of literature does support further studies in humans. We suggest clinical trials in which the mechanisms of action of ASA in lung injury models are being evaluated to guide optimal timing and dose, before prospective randomized trials.

Indexed as

AnimalsAspirinHumansPlatelet ActivationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAspirin

Identifiers

PMID27984533
PMCPMC5175412
OpenAlexW2523551774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.