Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27984235›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2017

Intraductal Tubulopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis of 33 Cases.

Olca Basturk, Volkan Adsay, Gokce Askan, Deepti Dhall, Giuseppe Zamboni, Michio Shimizu, Karina Cymes, Fatima Carneiro, Serdar Balci, Carlie Sigel and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Eggplant-like pancreas: transformation in a year.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. When BRG1 Turns Off: Chromatin Remodeling and YAP Signaling Drive ITPN Progression.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  12. Rare pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A pictorial review.European journal of radiology open · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Olca BasturkDepartments of *Pathology #Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY †Departments of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA ‡Departments of Pathology, University of Verona and Negrar Hospital, Verona, Italy §Departments of Pathology, Hakujikai Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan ∥Departments of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar São João/University of Porto and Institute for Research and Innovation in Health/Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto (Ipatimup), Porto, Portugal. ¶Departments of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf **Departments of Pathology, Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Volkan Adsay
Gokce Askan
Deepti Dhall
Giuseppe Zamboni
Michio Shimizu
Karina Cymes
Fatima Carneiro
Serdar Balci
Carlie Sigel
Michelle D Reid
Irene Esposito
Helena Baldaia
Peter Allen
Günter Klöppel
David S Klimstra
Emory University · USHospital de São João · PTCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) is a relatively recently described member of the pancreatic intraductal neoplasm family. Thus, the literature on its histologic and immunohistochemical features, clinical behavior, and its similarities and differences from other pancreatic neoplasms is limited. Thirty-three cases of ITPN, the largest series to date, were identified. Immunohistochemical labeling for cytokeratins, glycoproteins, pancreatic enzymes, markers for intestinal and neuroendocrine differentiation, and antibodies associated with genetic alterations previously described in pancreatic neoplasms was performed. Clinicopathologic features and survival was assessed. Seventeen patients were female and 14 were male. Mean age was 55 years (range, 25 to 79 y). Median overall tumor size was 4.5 cm (range, 0.5 to 15 cm). Forty-five percent of the tumors occurred in the head, 32% in the body/tail, and 23% showed diffuse involvement. Microscopically, the tumors were characterized by intraductal nodules composed of tightly packed small tubular glands lined by cuboidal cells lacking apparent mucin. Although it was often challenging to determine its extent, invasion was present in 71%. Almost all tumors labeled for CAM5.2, CK7, and CK19; most expressed CA19.9, MUC1, and MUC6. CDX2, MUC2, trypsin, chymotrypsin, chromogranin, and synaptophysin were not expressed. SMAD4 expression was retained in 100%; p16 expression and p53 overexpression was seen in 33% and 27%, respectively. Follow-up information was available for 22 patients (median follow-up, 45 mo; range, 11 to 173 mo). Two patients with invasive carcinoma died of disease at 23 and 41 months, respectively. One patient died of unrelated causes at 49 months. Twelve patients were alive with disease. Seven patients were alive with no evidence of disease. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 100% in patients without an invasive component and 100%, 91%, and 71%, respectively, in patients with an invasive component (P=0.7). ITPN is a distinct clinicopathologic entity in the pancreas. Despite the difficulties of determining the extent of invasive carcinoma in many cases, the overall outcome seems to be relatively favorable and substantially better than that of conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, even when only the cases with invasive carcinoma are considered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27984235
PMCPMC5309137
OpenAlexW2565832627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.