Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27983734›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2017

Clinical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve in anterior chamber versus ciliary sulcus.

A Bayer, M Önol

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Long-term outcomes of pars plana Ahmed valve implant and vitrectomy in eyes with refractory glaucoma.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Novel Technique for Recurrent Tube Exposure Repair.Case reports in ophthalmological medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Comparison of surgical outcomes between sulcus and anterior chamber implanted glaucoma drainage devices.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A BayerDünyagöz Ankara Hospital, Glaucoma Department, Ankara, Turkey.
M ÖnolDünyagöz Ankara Hospital, Glaucoma Department, Ankara, Turkey.
Dünyagöz Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) tube insertion through the anterior chamber angle (ACA) or through the ciliary sulcus (CS).Patients and methodsIn this case-control study, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of consecutive glaucoma patients who had undergone AGV implantation either through the ACA or the CS between March 2009 and December 2014. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications prescribed, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), glaucoma type, success rate, complications, and survival ratios. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS.ResultsThere were 68 eyes in the ACA group and 35 eyes in the CS group. There were no significant differences between the groups for age, sex, laterality, IOP, preoperative glaucoma medication number, BCVA or glaucoma type (P>0.05). The postoperative follow-up period was 27.2±16.5 months and 30.2±17.7 months for the ACA and the CS groups (P=0.28); IOP values were significantly reduced at the last visit to 16.4±7.2 mm Hg and 14.4±6.8 mm Hg. The difference in the last-visit IOP between the groups was not significant (P=0.06), but the IOP reduction ratio was higher in the CS group (P=0.03). There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative medications (P=0.18). Postoperative complications were similar, but the incidence of flat anterior chamber was higher in the ACA group (P=0.05).ConclusionsThe use of an AGV can control IOP in the majority of cases whether placed in the ACA or the CS. The IOP reduction ratio seemed to be higher in the CS group.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsAdultAnterior ChamberAntihypertensive AgentsCase-Control StudiesCiliary BodyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis ImplantationRetrospective StudiesTonometry, OcularAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID27983734
PMCPMC5395999
OpenAlexW2563107793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.