ArticleEye (London, England)2017
Genetic screening in Iranian patients with retinoblastoma.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delving Into Retinoblastoma Genetics: Discovery of Novel Mutations and Their Clinical Impact: Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of RB1 gene screening from blood collected on a single day from 411 family members of 113 Retinoblastoma survivors in India.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- An update in the applications of exosomes in cancer theranostics: from research to clinical trials.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Effects of folate-conjugated FeMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeThe most common intraocular tumor in childhood, retinoblastoma, is largely associated with mutations in the RB1 gene. In the most comprehensive RB1 screening in Iran, we evaluated the RB1 mutations in 106 patients with retinoblastoma, including 73 bilateral (heritable) and 33 unilateral (sporadic) cases.Patients and methodsMutations were identified using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) PCR and direct sequencing of the 27 coding exons of RB1 and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).Results and ConclusionWe found 33 (31%) and 64 (60%) patients with sporadic unilateral and bilateral retinoblastoma, respectively as well as 9 (8.5%) cases with hereditary bilateral retinoblastoma. In total, we identified 52 causative RB1 mutations in 106 patients (global mutation rate of 49%). Of the 52 patients, 48 (92%) had sporadic and familial bilateral and 4 (8%) had sporadic unilateral RB. Therefore, the detection rate of RB1 mutations was 66% (48/73) and 12% (4/33) in bilateral and unilateral cases, respectively. Mutations were classified as nonsense in 31 (60%), missense in 1 (2%), large deletion in 11 (21%), small deletion in the 7 novel (15%) and splice site mutation in 2 (4%) patients with RB. Of 31 nonsense mutations, 23 (74%) occurred in the 11 Arginine codons of the RB1. Seven mutations (13%) were novel, and 45 (87%) had been previously reported. Thirty-three mutations were single-base substitutions leading to 31 nonsense amino acid changes and 2 splice site mutations in introns 12 and 16 of RB1. The altered 3D model structures of the RB1 novel mutant proteins are also predicted in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.