Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27983682›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

Zebrafish as an In Vivo Model to Assess Epigenetic Effects of Ionizing Radiation.

Eva Yi Kong, Shuk Han Cheng, Kwan Ngok Yu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of optical reporters of radiation effectsJournal of biomedical optics · 2023
    Review
  5. The Advances in Epigenetics for Cancer Radiotherapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biological basis of radiation protection needs rejuvenation.International journal of radiation biology · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eva Yi KongDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. yikong3-c@my.cityu.edu.hk.
Shuk Han ChengDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. bhcheng@cityu.edu.hk.
Kwan Ngok YuDepartment of Physics and Materials Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. peter.yu@cityu.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to ionizing radiations (IRs) is ubiquitous in our environment and can be categorized into "targeted" effects and "non-targeted" effects. In addition to inducing deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage, IR exposure leads to epigenetic alterations that do not alter DNA sequence. Using an appropriate model to study the biological effects of radiation is crucial to better understand IR responses as well as to develop new strategies to alleviate exposure to IR. Zebrafish,

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingAnimalsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesModels, AnimalZebrafishHistonesepigenetic effectsionizing radiationzebrafish embryos

Identifiers

PMID27983682
PMCPMC5187908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.