ArticleCancers2016
Ensuring Quality in Online Palliative Care Resources.
Article in Cancers, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Development of an Online Palliative Care Toolkit for Cirrhosis.Canadian liver journal · 2025Article
- Enhancing the efficacy of healthcare information websites: a case for the development of a best practice framework.BMJ open · 2024Review
- Palliative Care Within the Primary Health Care Setting in Australia: A Scoping Review.Public health reviews · 2022Article
- Benefits of Structured Engagement with Target Audiences of a Health Website: Study Design for a Multi-Case Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- "It's given me confidence": a pragmatic qualitative evaluation exploring the perceived benefits of online end-of-life education on clinical care.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- Quality of Web Information About Palliative Care on Websites from the United States and Japan: Comparative Evaluation Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2018Article
- The contribution of a MOOC to community discussions around death and dying.BMC palliative care · 2018Article
- Evaluation of a toolkit resource package to support positive workplace behaviours in relation to quality end-of-life care in Australian hospitals.BMJ open quality · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence and information is an integral part of the processes enabling clinical and service delivery within health. It is used by health professionals in clinical practice and in developing their professional knowledge, by policy makers in decision making, and is sought by health consumers to help them manage their health needs and assess their options. Increasingly, this evidence and information is being disseminated and sought through online channels. The internet is fundamentally changing how health information is being distributed and accessed. Clinicians, patients, community members, and decision makers have an unprecedented capacity to find online information about palliative care and end-of-life care. However, it is clear that not all individuals have the skills to be able to find and assess the quality of the resources they need. There are also many issues in creating online resources that are current, relevant and authoritative for use by health professionals and by health consumers. This paper explores the processes and structures used in creating a major national palliative care knowledge resource, the CareSearch website, to meet the needs of health professionals and of patients and their families and carers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.