Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27982107›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Recent breeding programs enhanced genetic diversity in both desi and kabuli varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Mahendar Thudi, Annapurna Chitikineni, Xin Liu, Weiming He, Manish Roorkiwal, Wei Yang, Jianbo Jian, Dadakhalandar Doddamani, Pooran M Gaur, Abhishek Rathore and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A Comprehensive Review on Chickpea (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Editorial: Accelerating Genetic Gains in Pulses.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahendar ThudiInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Annapurna ChitikineniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Xin LiuInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Weiming HeBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Manish RoorkiwalInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Wei YangBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Jianbo JianBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Dadakhalandar DoddamaniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Pooran M GaurInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Abhishek RathoreInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Srinivasan SamineniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Rachit K SaxenaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Dawen XuBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Narendra P SinghAll India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Chickpea, Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi, India.
Sushil K ChaturvediIndian Institute of Pulses Research (IIPR), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Kanpur, India.
Gengyun ZhangBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Jun WangBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Swapan K DattaVisva-Bharati, Santiniketan, India.
Xun XuBGI - Shenzhen, China.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INBGI Group (China) · CNIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INVisva-Bharati University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to understand the impact of breeding on genetic diversity and gain insights into temporal trends in diversity in chickpea, a set of 100 chickpea varieties released in 14 countries between 1948 and 2012 were re-sequenced. For analysis, the re-sequencing data for 29 varieties available from an earlier study was also included. Copy number variations and presence absence variations identified in the present study have potential to drive phenotypic variations for trait improvement. Re-sequencing of a large number of varieties has provided opportunities to inspect the genetic and genomic changes reflecting the history of breeding, which we consider as breeding signatures and the selected loci may provide targets for crop improvement. Our study also reports enhanced diversity in both desi and kabuli varieties as a result of recent chickpea breeding efforts. The current study will aid the explicit efforts to breed for local adaptation in the context of anticipated climate changes.

Indexed as

BreedingGenetic VariationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAgricultureCicerDisease ResistanceDroughtsGenetics, PopulationGenome, PlantHaplotypesINDEL MutationLinkage DisequilibriumPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27982107
PMCPMC5159902
OpenAlexW2564088930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.