Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27981878›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part C, Methods2017

Xenogeneic Decellularized Scaffold: A Novel Platform for Ovary Regeneration.

Wen-Yue Liu, Shi-Gang Lin, Ru-Yi Zhuo, Yuan-Yuan Xie, Wei Pan, Xian-Feng Lin, Fei-Xia Shen

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Yue Liu1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
Shi-Gang Lin2 School of the First Clinical Medical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
Ru-Yi Zhuo1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
Yuan-Yuan Xie1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
Wei Pan1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
Xian-Feng Lin3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, China .
Fei-Xia Shen1 Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University , Wenzhou, China .
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women younger than 40 years may face early menopause because of premature ovarian failure (POF). The cause of POF can be idiopathic or iatrogenic, especially the cancer-induced oophorectomy and chemo- or radiation therapy. The current treatments, including hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and cryopreservation techniques, have increased risk of ovarian cancer and may reintroduce malignant cells after autografting. Decellularization technique has been regarded as a novel regenerative medicine strategy for organ replacement, wherein the living cells of an organ are removed, leaving the extracellular matrix (ECM) for cellular seeding. This study aimed to produce a xenogeneic decellularized ovary (D-ovary) scaffold as a platform for ovary regeneration and transplantation. We have developed a novel decellularization protocol for porcine ovary by treatment with physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods. Using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, DAPI staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and quantitative analysis, this approach proved effective in removing cellular components and preserving ECM. Furthermore, the results of biological safety evaluation demonstrated that the D-ovary tissues were noncytotoxic for rat ovarian cells in vitro and caused only a minimal immunogenic response in vivo. In addition, the D-ovary tissues successfully supported rat granulosa cell penetration ex vivo and showed an improvement in estradiol (E2) hormone secretion.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCells, CulturedCell SurvivalEstradiolExtracellular MatrixFemaleOvaryRatsRegenerationRegenerative MedicineSwineTissue EngineeringEstradiolbioengineering in organ transplantationdecellularizationextracellular matrixpremature ovarian failureregenerative medicine

Identifiers

PMID27981878
PMCPMC5315000
OpenAlexW2575439798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.