Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27981674›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

The canonical semantic network supports residual language function in chronic post-stroke aphasia.

Joseph C Griffis, Rodolphe Nenert, Jane B Allendorfer, Jennifer Vannest, Scott Holland, Aimee Dietz, Jerzy P Szaflarski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph C GriffisDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Rodolphe NenertDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Jane B AllendorferDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Jennifer VannestCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Scott HollandCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Aimee DietzUniversity of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Jerzy P SzaflarskiDepartment of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

Post-Stroke Aphasia and rTMS Treatment (PART) StudyR01HD068488 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SZAFLARSKI, JERZY P · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
fMRI of Language Recover Following Stroke in AdultsR01NS048281 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI SZAFLARSKI, JERZY P · 2008 to 2012
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068488NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS048281
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current theories of language recovery after stroke are limited by a reliance on small studies. Here, we aimed to test predictions of current theory and resolve inconsistencies regarding right hemispheric contributions to long-term recovery. We first defined the canonical semantic network in 43 healthy controls. Then, in a group of 43 patients with chronic post-stroke aphasia, we tested whether activity in this network predicted performance on measures of semantic comprehension, naming, and fluency while controlling for lesion volume effects. Canonical network activation accounted for 22%-33% of the variance in language test scores. Whole-brain analyses corroborated these findings, and revealed a core set of regions showing positive relationships to all language measures. We next evaluated the relationship between activation magnitudes in left and right hemispheric portions of the network, and characterized how right hemispheric activation related to the extent of left hemispheric damage. Activation magnitudes in each hemispheric network were strongly correlated, but four right frontal regions showed heightened activity in patients with large lesions. Activity in two of these regions (inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularis and supplementary motor area) was associated with better language abilities in patients with larger lesions, but poorer language abilities in patients with smaller lesions. Our results indicate that bilateral language networks support language processing after stroke, and that right hemispheric activations related to extensive left hemispheric damage occur outside of the canonical semantic network and differentially relate to behavior depending on the extent of left hemispheric damage. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1636-1658, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsSemantic WebAdultAgedAphasiaBrainFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLanguage TestsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygenfMRIlanguage recoverylesionright hemispherestroke

Identifiers

PMID27981674
PMCPMC5299060
OpenAlexW2517495997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.