ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017
The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03169114 (Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis Treatment Without Operation - Antibiotic Non-operative Management Strategy Versus Surgery Management Strategy, a Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis Treatment Without Operation - Antibiotic Non-operative Management Strategy Versus Surgery Management Strategy, a Non-Inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for risk assessment of acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of RIPASA versus modified Alvarado score in acute appendicitis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study from a tertiary centre in India.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of the effectiveness of RIPASA and modified Alvarado scores in identifying perforated appendicitis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the predictive value of scoring systems in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a comparative prospective study.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy and Educational Value of the RIPASA Score in Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Study in an Emergency Department Training Setting.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Modified APPEND Score for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in a New Zealand Pasifika Population.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Observational
- Article
- Article
- Alvarado or RIPASA? Which one do you use to diagnose acute appendicitis?: A cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- Accuracy of RIPASA and Lintula Scores in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis Using Surgical Findings as the Gold Standard.Cureus · 2022Article
- A comparative study of the RIPASA and Alvarado scores in geriatric patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2022Article
- Role of platelet indices as a biomarker for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and as a predictor of complicated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2020Review
- Comparison between the specificity and sensitivity of the RIPASA and Alvarado Scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis among patients with complaints of right iliac fossa.AIMS public health · 2020Article
- Can RIPASA Scoring System Predict the Pathological Stage of Acute Appendicitis?Emergency medicine international · 2019Article
- Comment on article entitled "The RIPASA score is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a western population".International journal of colorectal disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe definitive diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) requires histopathological examination. Various clinical diagnostic scoring systems attempt to reduce negative appendectomy rates. The most commonly used in Western Europe and the USA is the Alvarado score. The Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis (RIPASA) score achieves better sensitivity and specificity in Asian and Middle Eastern populations. We aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the RIPASA score in Irish patients with AA.
methodsAll patients who presented to our institution with right iliac fossa pain and clinically suspected AA between January 1 and December 31, 2015, were indentified from our hospital inpatient enquiry database and retrospectively studied. Operating theatre records and histology reports confirmed those who underwent a non-elective operative procedure and the presence or absence of AA. SPSS version 22 was used for statistical analysis. Standard deviation is provided where appropriate.
resultsTwo hundred eight patients were included in the study (106/51% male, mean age 22.7 ± 9.2 years). One hundred thirty-five (64.9%) had histologically confirmed AA (mean symptom duration = 36.19 ± 15.90 h). At a score ≥7.5, the previously determined score most likely associated with AA in Eastern populations, the RIPASA scoring system demonstrated a sensitivity of 85.39%, specificity of 69.86%, positive predictive value of 84.06%, negative predictive value of 72.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 80% in our cohort.
conclusionThe RIPASA score is a useful tool to aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the Irish population. A score of ≥7.5 provides sensitivity and specificity exceeding that previously documented for the Alvarado score in Western populations. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO THE LITERATURE?: This is the first study evaluating the utility of the RIPASA score in predicting acute appendicitis in a Western population. At a value of 7.5, a cut-off score suggestive of appendicitis in the Eastern population, RIPASA demonstrated a high-sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy in our cohort and was more accurate than the commonly used Alvarado score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.