ArticleUrolithiasis2017
Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent among idiopathic stone formers, but does correction pose any risk?
Article in Urolithiasis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between Circulating Vitamin D Level and Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2017Pooled it
- Rethinking vitamin D supplementation in calcium stone formers.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in calcium oxalate stone formers in Ontario, Canada, and the impact of vitamin D supplementation.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Environmental determinants in the development of kidney stone.Urolithiasis · 2025Review
- Review
- Vitamin D and Calcium Supplementation and Urolithiasis: A Controversial and Multifaceted Relationship.Nutrients · 2023Review
- Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbance in kidney stone disease: a narrative review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- UPDATE - Canadian Urological Association guideline: Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation and Their Association with Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2021Review
- Metabolic effects of cholecalciferol supplementation in patients with calcium nephrolithiasis and vitamin D deficiency.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016.Urolithiasis · 2021Article
- Effect of Vitamin D Treatment on Dynamics of Stones Formation in the Urinary Tract and Bone Density in Children with Idiopathic Hypercalciuria.Nutrients · 2020Article
- Vitamin D and calcium kidney stones: a review and a proposal.International urology and nephrology · 2019Review
- Confounding risk factors and preventative measures driving nephrolithiasis global makeup.World journal of nephrology · 2018Review
- Medical therapy for nephrolithiasis: State of the art.Asian journal of urology · 2018Review
- Vitamin D, Hypercalciuria and Kidney Stones.Nutrients · 2018Review
- Drug-Induced Kidney Stones and Crystalline Nephropathy: Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment.Drugs · 2018Review
- The impact of vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D level, urinary calcium excretion and bone density in patients with hypercalciuria and vitamin D deficiency - preliminary report.Developmental period medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While vitamin D (vitD) deficiency is thought to contribute to poor health in a variety of ways and should be corrected, there is still concern about giving vitD supplements to patients with a history of nephrolithiasis. The aim is to study the prevalence of vitD deficiency and the effect on stone risk of cholecalciferol (vitD3) supplementation in a cohort of idiopathic stone formers (ISF). We screened for vitD deficiency and urinary measures of stone risk, comparing vitD deficient (serum 25-OH vitD ≤30 nmol/L; ≤12 ng/mL) with vitD insufficient (31-75 nmol/L; 13-30 ng/mL) or vitD replete (>75 nmol/L; >30 ng/mL); we investigated the effect of giving vitD3 (20,000 IU orally, weekly for 4 months) to 37 of the vitD deficients. Thirty-one percent (142/456) were vitD deficient, 57% (259/456) vitD insufficient, and the rest (12%) vitD replete (55/456). Comparison among the groups showed that baseline 24-h urinary measures related to stone risk expressed as concentration ratios over urine creatinine (Cr), such as U. Calcium/Cr, U. Oxalate/Cr, U. Citrate/Cr, and U. Uric acid/Cr were not significantly different. VitD3 supplementation did significantly increase serum 25-OH vitD levels and U. Phosphate/Cr ratios, as well as reduce serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. Following vitD3 supplementation, there was an overall rise in 24-h urine calcium excretion, but it failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.06). U. Calcium/Cr increased in 22 out of 37 patients (average increase +0.07 mmol/mmol), decreased in 14 (average decrease -0.13 mmol/mmol), and remained unchanged in 1; 6 out of 26 initially normocalciuric ISF developed hypercalciuria; and 6 out of 9 patients who became vitD replete were hypercalciuric after supplementation. It is appropriate to monitor urinary Ca excretion in vitD-supplemented stone formers, because it may reveal underlying hypercalciuria in some treated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.