Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27981259›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2016

Assessment of Adherence to Visual Correction and Occlusion Therapy in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study.

Carolyn Drews-Botsch, George Cotsonis, Marianne Celano, Scott R Lambert

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00212134 (Infant Aphakia Treatment Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00212134 nacompletednot on this map

Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2004 to 2020Enrolled114ConditionsCongenital CataractArmsContact lens correction of aphakia, Intraocular lens implantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Development of a Spectacle Wear Monitor System: SpecsOn Monitor.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolyn Drews-BotschDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University.
George CotsonisDepartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University.
Marianne CelanoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine.
Scott R LambertDepartment of Ophthalmology, Emory University School of Medicine.
Emory University · US

Funding

Infant Aphakia Treatment StudyU10EY013272 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LAMBERT, SCOTT R · 2004 to 2014
$8.1M
Coordinating Center for Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS)U10EY013287 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LONG, QI · 2004 to 2014
$5.8M
Infant Aphakia Treatment Study-Clinical CentersUG1EY025553 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DREWS-BOTSCH, CAROLYN DAWSON · 2015 to 2018
$933k
Coordinating Center for Infant Aphakia Treatment Study (IATS)UG1EY013287 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI NIZAM, AZHAR · 2015 to 2018
$917k
Infant Aphakia Treatment Study-Chairman's GrantUG1EY013272 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LAMBERT, SCOTT R · 2015 to 2018
$639k
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY013272NEI NIH HHS U10 EY013287NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY013272NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY013287NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY025553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occlusion therapy throughout early childhood is believed to be efficacious in treating deprivation amblyopia but has not been rigorously assessed in clinical trials. Further, tools to assess adherence to such therapy over an extended period of time are lacking. Using data from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study, a randomized clinical trial of treatment for unilateral congenital cataract, we examined the use of quarterly 48-hour recall interviews and annual 7-day prospective diaries to assess reported hours of patching in 114 children throughout the first 5 years of life. Consistency of data reported was assessed using correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients. Both interview and diary data showed excellent consistency with Cronbach's Alpha's ranging from 0.69 to 0.88 for hours of patching and 0.60 to 0.73 for hours of sleep. However, caregivers reported somewhat more adherence in prospective diaries than retrospective interviews. Completion rates, on the other hand, were substantially higher for telephone interviews than prospective diaries. For example, after four years of surgery response rates to telephone interviews exceeded 75% versus completion rates of only 54% for diaries. In situations where occlusion dose monitors cannot be used for assessing adherence to occlusion therapy, such as in infants or over an extended period of time, quantitative assessments of occlusion therapy can be obtained by parental report, either as a series of prospective diaries or a series of recall interviews.

Indexed as

adherenceCongenital cataractdiaryocclusion therapyrecall interview

Identifiers

PMID27981259
PMCPMC5152926
OpenAlexW2414104086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.