Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27981001›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2016

Capacity Fade Analysis of Sulfur Cathodes in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.

Jianhua Yan, Xingbo Liu, Bingyun Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Ni-CeOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Long Cycle Life Organic Polysulfide Catholyte for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jianhua YanBiomaterials Bioengineering and Nanotechnology Laboratory Department of Orthopaedics West Virginia University Morgantown WV 26506 USA; Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown WV 26506 USA.
Xingbo LiuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering West Virginia University Morgantown WV 26506 USA.
Bingyun LiBiomaterials Bioengineering and Nanotechnology Laboratory Department of Orthopaedics West Virginia University Morgantown WV 26506 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rechargeable lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries are receiving ever-increasing attention due to their high theoretical energy density and inexpensive raw sulfur materials. However, their rapid capacity fade has been one of the key barriers for their further improvement. It is well accepted that the major degradation mechanisms of S-cathodes include low electrical conductivity of S and sulfides, precipitation of nonconductive Li

Indexed as

electrolytesfundamentalsLi–S batteriespoly‐shuttle

Identifiers

PMID27981001
PMCPMC5157169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.