Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980805›Full record

ArticleZoological letters2016

Recurrent evolution of gut symbiotic bacteria in pentatomid stinkbugs.

Takahiro Hosokawa, Yu Matsuura, Yoshitomo Kikuchi, Takema Fukatsu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoological letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The importance of host physical niches for the stability of gut microbiome composition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reduced Genome of the Gut Symbiotic Bacterium "Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro Hosokawa *National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566 Japan.
Yu Matsuura *National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566 Japan.
Yoshitomo KikuchiNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Hokkaido Center, Sapporo, 062-8517 Japan.
Takema FukatsuNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, 305-8566 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5987-2602
Kyushu University · JPNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPUniversity of the Ryukyus · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiverse animals are intimately associated with microbial symbionts. How such host-symbiont associations have evolved is a fundamental biological issue. Recent studies have revealed a variety of evolutionary relationships, such as obligatory, facultative, and free-living, of gut bacterial symbiosis within the stinkbug family Pentatomidae, although the whole evolutionary picture remains elusive.

resultsHere we investigated a comprehensive assembly of Japanese pentatomid stinkbugs representing 28 genera, 35 species, and 143 populations. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cloning, and sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA gene from their midgut symbiotic organ consistently detected a single bacterial species from each of the insect samples, indicating a general tendency toward monosymbiotic gut association. Bacterial sequences detected from different populations of the same species were completely or nearly identical, indicating that the majority of the gut symbiotic associations are stably maintained at the species level. Furthermore, bacterial sequences detected from different species in the same genus tended to form well-supported clades, suggesting that host-symbiont associations are often stable even at the genus level. Meanwhile, when we compared such sequences with published sequences available in DNA databases, we found a number of counter-examples to such stable host-symbiont relationships; i.e., symbionts from different host species in the same genus may be phylogenetically distant, and symbionts from the same host species may be phylogenetically diverse. Likewise, symbionts of diverse pentatomid species may be closely related to symbionts of other stinkbug families, and symbionts of diverse pentatomid species may even be allied to free-living bacteria. Molecular evolutionary analyses revealed that higher molecular evolutionary rates, higher AT nucleotide compositions, and smaller genome sizes tended to be associated with the pentatomid symbionts constituting the stable lineages, whereas these traits were rarely observed in the pentatomid symbionts of promiscuous type.

conclusionsThese results indicate that gut symbiotic bacteria have evolved repeatedly and dynamically in the stinkbug family Pentatomidae, which have plausibly entailed frequent symbiont acquisitions, losses, replacements and transfers, while establishing a number of relatively stable host-symbiont associations. The diverse host-symbiont relationships observed in the Pentatomidae will provide an ideal arena for investigating the evolution of symbiosis experimentally and theoretically.

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneGut symbiontMolecular evolutionPentatomidaeReductive genome evolutionStinkbugγ-Proteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID27980805
PMCPMC5131451
OpenAlexW2559630672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.