ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2016
Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Pooled it
- Surrogacy from a reproductive rights and justice perspective: a narrative review.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Article
- Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022Review
- ART Innovations: Fostering Women's Psychophysical Health between Bioethics Precepts and Human Rights.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Embryo donation among Latin-Americans who have attended assisted reproduction techniques: a first empirical approach.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Article
- Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- Treating Infertility: Current Affairs of Cross-border Reproductive Care.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2019Article
- Updates and reflections about the IJHPR, on the eve of its seventh year.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017Article
- The right to know one's genetic origins and cross-border medically assisted reproduction.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for the treatment of infertility has brought benefit to many individuals around the world. But infertility and its treatment continue to be a cause of suffering, and over the past decade, there has been a steady growth in a new global market of inter-country medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) involving 'third-party' individuals acting as surrogate mothers and gamete donors in reproductive collaborations for the benefit of other individuals and couples who wish to have children. At the same time there is evidence of a double standard of care for third-party women involved in IMAR, violations of human rights of children and women, and extreme abuses that are tantamount to reproductive trafficking. This paper is the report of an inter-disciplinary working group of experts who convened in Israel to discuss the complex issues of IMAR. In Israel too IMAR practices have grown rapidly in recent years, mainly because of restrictions on access to domestic surrogacy for same sex couples and a chronically insufficient supply of egg cells for the treatment of couples and singles in need. Drawing upon local expertise, the paper describes documented practices that are harmful, suggests principles of good practice based on an ethic of care, and calls for action at the international, national and professional levels to establish a human rights based system of international governance for IMAR based on three regulatory models: public health monitoring, inter-country adoption, and trafficking in human beings, organs and tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.