Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980721›Full record

ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2016

Ethics and regulation of inter-country medically assisted reproduction: a call for action.

Carmel Shalev, Adi Moreno, Hedva Eyal, Michal Leibel, Rhona Schuz, Talia Eldar-Geva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Updates and reflections about the IJHPR, on the eve of its seventh year.Israel journal of health policy research · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmel ShalevDepartment for Reproduction and Society, International Center for Health Law and Ethics, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel.
Adi MorenoMorgan Centre for Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Hedva EyalFedermann School of Public Policy and Government, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michal LeibelTask Force on Human Trafficking, Jerusalem, Israel.
Rhona SchuzCenter for the Rights of the Child and the Family, Sha'arei Mishpat Law School, Hod HaSharon, Israel.
Talia Eldar-GevaDepartment of Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILSha'arei Mishpat College · ILShaare Zedek Medical Center · ILUniversity of Haifa · ILUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for the treatment of infertility has brought benefit to many individuals around the world. But infertility and its treatment continue to be a cause of suffering, and over the past decade, there has been a steady growth in a new global market of inter-country medically assisted reproduction (IMAR) involving 'third-party' individuals acting as surrogate mothers and gamete donors in reproductive collaborations for the benefit of other individuals and couples who wish to have children. At the same time there is evidence of a double standard of care for third-party women involved in IMAR, violations of human rights of children and women, and extreme abuses that are tantamount to reproductive trafficking. This paper is the report of an inter-disciplinary working group of experts who convened in Israel to discuss the complex issues of IMAR. In Israel too IMAR practices have grown rapidly in recent years, mainly because of restrictions on access to domestic surrogacy for same sex couples and a chronically insufficient supply of egg cells for the treatment of couples and singles in need. Drawing upon local expertise, the paper describes documented practices that are harmful, suggests principles of good practice based on an ethic of care, and calls for action at the international, national and professional levels to establish a human rights based system of international governance for IMAR based on three regulatory models: public health monitoring, inter-country adoption, and trafficking in human beings, organs and tissues.

Indexed as

Human RightsChildConsensusFemaleGlobal HealthHumansHuman TraffickingInfant, NewbornInfertilityIsraelMaleMedical TourismPublic Health SurveillanceReproductive Techniques, AssistedCross-border reproductive careEgg donationEthic of careHuman rightsHuman traffickingMedically assisted reproductionReproductive ethicsSurrogacy

Identifiers

PMID27980721
PMCPMC5142386
OpenAlexW2560296342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.