Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980713›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2016

Sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth patterns: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Zoe A Broere-Brown, Esme Baan, Sarah Schalekamp-Timmermans, Bero O Verburg, Vincent W V Jaddoe, Eric A P Steegers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Infant social withdrawal and rapid infant weight gain.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing the birth weight of ART-conceived offspring.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zoe A Broere-BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Esme BaanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sarah Schalekamp-TimmermansDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bero O VerburgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent W V JaddoeDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands ; Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric A P SteegersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to assess whether sex-specific differences in fetal and infant growth exist.

methodsThis study was embedded in the Generation R Study, a population-based prospective birth cohort. In total, 8556 live singleton births were included. Fetal growth was assessed by ultrasound. During the first trimester, crown-rump-length (CRL) was measured. In the second and third trimester of pregnancy head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) were assessed. Information on infant growth during the first 2 years of life was obtained from Community Health Centers and included HC, body weight and length.

resultsIn the first trimester, male CRL was larger than female CRL (0.12 SD [95% CI 0.03,0.22]). From the second trimester onwards, HC and AC were larger in males than in females (0.30 SD [95% CI 0.26,0.34] and 0.09 SD [95% CI 0.05,0.014], respectively). However, FL in males was smaller compared to female fetuses (0.21 SD [95% CI 0.17,0.26]). Repeated measurement analyses showed a different prenatal as well as postnatal HC growth pattern between males and females. A different pattern in body weight was observed with a higher body weight in males until the age of 12 months where after females have a higher body weight.

conclusionsSex affects both fetal as well as infant growth. Besides body size, also body proportions differ between males and females with different growth patterns. This sexual dimorphism might arise from differences in fetal programming with sex specific health differences as a consequence in later life.

Indexed as

Biometric indicesFetal growthFetal sexGrowth pattern

Identifiers

PMID27980713
PMCPMC5135770
OpenAlexW2558826381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.