Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980658›Full record

ArticleBMC proceedings2016

Network-guided interaction mining for the blood pressure phenotype of unrelated individuals in genetic analysis workshop 19.

Adeline Lo, Michael Agne, Jonathan Auerbach, Rachel Fan, Shaw-Hwa Lo, Pei Wang, Tian Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC proceedings, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adeline LoDepartment of Politics, Princeton University, 130 Corwin Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544-1012 USA.
Michael AgneDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, 10027 USA.
Jonathan AuerbachDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, 10027 USA.
Rachel FanDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, 10027 USA.
Shaw-Hwa LoDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, 10027 USA.
Pei WangDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, 10029 USA.
Tian ZhengDepartment of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, 10027 USA.
Columbia University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USPrinceton University · US

Funding

GENETIC ANALYSIS OF COMMON DISEASES: AN EVALUATIONR01GM031575 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI ALMASY, LAURA A. · 1985 to 2016
$7.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM031575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between genes are an important part of the genetic architecture of complex diseases. In this paper, we use literature-guided individual genes known to be associated with type 2 diabetes (referred to as "seed genes") to create a larger list of genes that share implied or direct networks with these seed genes. This larger list of genes are known to interact with each other, but whether they interact in ways to influence hypertension in individuals presents an interesting question. Using Genetic Analysis Workshop data on individuals with diabetes, for which only case-control labels of hypertension are known, we offer a foray into identification of diabetes-related gene interactions that are associated with hypertension. We use the approach of Lo et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 12387-12392, 2008), which creates a score to identify pairwise significant gene associations. We find that the genes

Identifiers

PMID27980658
PMCPMC5133535
OpenAlexW2556194574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.