Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980466›Full record

ArticleJournal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience2016

The Influence of Assay Design, Blinding, and

Max G Aleman, Lauren J Marconi, Nam H Nguyen, Jae M Park, Maria M Patino, Yuchi Wang, Celeste S Watkins, Chris Shelley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The COVID-19 and Taste Lab: A Mini Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience on Taste Differences and COVID-19 Susceptibility.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Max G AlemanDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Lauren J MarconiDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Nam H NguyenDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Jae M ParkDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Maria M PatinoDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Yuchi WangDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Celeste S WatkinsDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Chris ShelleyDepartment of Biology, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, PA 17604.
Franklin & Marshall College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection and grading of tastes corresponding to different taste modalities can be tested in engaging laboratory sessions using students themselves as test subjects. This article describes a series of experiments in which data pertaining to the detection of salty and sweet tastes are obtained, and the ability of the herb

Indexed as

dose-responseGymnema sylvestrepermutation testsensory transductiontaste

Identifiers

PMID27980466
PMCPMC5105959
OpenAlexW2847024178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.