Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980396›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2016

The employee's productivity in the health care sector in Poland and their impact on the treatment process of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Anna Rosiek, Aleksandra Rosiek-Kryszewska, Łukasz Leksowski, Tomasz Kornatowski, Krzysztof Leksowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna RosiekRoss-Medica; Faculty of Health Sciences, Public Health Department, Nicolaus Copernicus University.
Aleksandra Rosiek-KryszewskaFaculty of Pharmacy, Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University.
Łukasz LeksowskiFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation, Nicolaus Copernicus University.
Tomasz KornatowskiFaculty of Health Sciences, Public Health Department, Nicolaus Copernicus University.
Krzysztof LeksowskiFaculty of Health Sciences, Public Health Department, Nicolaus Copernicus University; Department of General Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Military Clinical Hospital in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PLMedica (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing the engagement of employees in the treatment process of patients may benefit a hospital and employee productivity and may result in better patient care and satisfaction with medical services. Given this, the first step in improving the quality of patient care is better availability of doctors for patients in a hospital ward.

methodsThe research for this paper was conducted in six health care units in the Kuyavian-Pomeranian province in Poland. The research assessed how the elements relating to employees' behavior and things characteristic to medical service influence patients' willingness to recommend a hospital.

resultsPatients' perception of services is linked with the behavior of medical employees and their engagement in the treatment process.

conclusionOur research indicates that individual employee recognition and collective recognition of hospital employees as a whole were identified as the most important factors in employee engagement in the treatment process (employee productivity) and patients' satisfaction with medical service.

Indexed as

employee’s productivityhospitalsmedical stafforganizational healthpublic healthworkplace interventions to enhance health

Identifiers

PMID27980396
PMCPMC5147408
OpenAlexW2560623731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.