ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2016
Preventative therapies and periodontal interventions for Down syndrome patients.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Home Efficacy of a Postbiotic-Based Gel Compared with a Gel Without Active Ingredients for the Treatment of Gingival Inflammation in Patients with Down Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations in down syndrome research.Translational science of rare diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sourcesMedline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and OpenGREY databases without language restriction until March 2016 plus manual searching of four specific journals and consideration of reference lists.Study selectionStudies evaluating different methods of periodontal treatment in Down syndrome patients measuring at least two periodontal parameters at different periods of assessment. Titles, abstracts and full texts were considered by two independent reviewers and a third where discussion did not reach consensus. Randomised controlled trials were evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The observational studies were evaluated using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction was carried out independently by two reviewers and organised into evidence tables. No meta-analysis was undertaken, however a narrative synthesis was presented.ResultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria; four longitudinal studies, one prospective case series and four clinical trials which included two cross-over studies and a controlled trial. The studies showed marked heterogeneity in terms of methodology, intervention and outcome measures. All studies, however, included assessment of different plaque and gingival indices.Three studies investigated outcomes after scaling and root planing, one of which compared surgical and non-surgical approaches. Periodontal pockets of 1-3 mm were statistically significantly improved with non-surgical treatment in comparison with pockets greater than 4 mm which showed greater reduction with surgical treatment. Six studies investigated different forms and uses of chlorhexidine, three of which investigated its use as an adjuvant to mechanical debridement and one which also included plaque disclosing as an intervention. Chlorhexidine was shown to be most effective when used daily as a 1% gel for toothbrushing. The use of a plaque disclosing tablet and fluoridated tooth paste, however, showed further improved outcomes with regards to plaque control.ConclusionsEight of the nine studies included showed improvement in the primary outcomes of improved plaque and gingival bleeding indices. Professional intervention and periodontal maintenance significantly reduced plaque and gingival indices, irrespective of the treatment performed. Increased frequency of interventions was associated with better outcomes, especially in younger age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27980329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.