Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27980228›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jie Lin, Guozhu Xie, Guixiang Liao, Baiyao Wang, Miaohong Yan, Hui Li, Yawei Yuan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Prognostic value of pre-treatmentLa Radiologia medica · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Efficacy of PretreatmentClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Focal Nasopharyngeal Activity Detected on [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  11. Pretreatment [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimal management of oligometastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guozhu XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Guixiang LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shenzhen people's Hospital, Second Clinical Medicine College of Jinan University, China.
Baiyao WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Miaohong YanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yawei YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) parameters is still controversial in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. We sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

resultsFifteen studies comprising 1,938 patients were included in this study. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) for EFS were 2.63 (95%CI 1.71-4.05) for SUVmax, 2.55 (95%CI 1.49-4.35) for MTV, and 3.32 (95%CI 1.23-8.95) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.07 (95%CI 1.54-2.79) for SUVmax, 3.86 (95%CI 1.85-8.06) for MTV, and 2.60 (95%CI 1.55-4.34) for TLG. The prognostic role of SUVmax, MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed to identify studies which associated 18F-FDG PET/CT to clinical survival outcomes of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. The summarized HRs for EFS and OS were estimated by using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity between trials.

conclusionsThe present meta-analysis confirms that high values of SUVmax, MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of adverse events or death in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, despite clinically heterogeneous nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the various methods adopted between these studies.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyCarcinomaFollow-Up StudiesHumansNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasROC CurveFluorodeoxyglucose F1818F-FDG PET/CTmetabolic tumor volumenasopharyngeal carcinomastandardized uptake valuetotal lesion glycolysis

Identifiers

PMID27980228
PMCPMC5464920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.