ArticleNucleic acids research2017
Large-scale mapping of mammalian transcriptomes identifies conserved genes associated with different cell states.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- LncRNA CYP4A22-AS1 promotes the progression of lung adenocarcinoma through the miR-205-5p/EREG and miR-34c-5p/BCL-2 axes.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- What are housekeeping genes?PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Comparative transcriptomics reveal tissue level specialization towards diet in prickleback fishes.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2022Article
- EpiAlign: an alignment-based bioinformatic tool for comparing chromatin state sequences.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Long non-coding RNAs discriminate the stages and gene regulatory states of human humoral immune response.Nature communications · 2019Article
- RISE: a database of RNA interactome from sequencing experiments.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Genomic and molecular control of cell type and cell type conversions.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2017Review
- RNA Biomarkers: Frontier of Precision Medicine for Cancer.Non-coding RNA · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Distinguishing cell states based only on gene expression data remains a challenging task. This is true even for analyses within a species. In cross-species comparisons, the results obtained by different groups have varied widely. Here, we integrate RNA-seq data from more than 40 cell and tissue types of four mammalian species to identify sets of associated genes as indicators for specific cell states in each species. We employ a statistical method, TROM, to identify both protein-coding and non-coding indicators. Next, we map the cell states within each species and also between species using these indicator genes. We recapitulate known phenotypic similarity between related cell and tissue types and reveal molecular basis for their similarity. We also report novel associations between several tissues and cell types with functional support. Moreover, our identified conserved associated genes are found to be a good resource for studying cell differentiation and reprogramming. Lastly, long non-coding RNAs can serve well as associated genes to indicate cell states. We further infer the biological functions of those non-coding associated genes based on their co-expressed protein-coding genes. This study demonstrates that combining statistical modeling with public RNA-seq data can be powerful for improving our understanding of cell identity control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.